Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 150 or Lamborghini Rubin 150?

Which should you choose?

The figures split: the Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 150 is ahead on hydraulic flow; the Lamborghini Rubin 150 is ahead on maximum permissible mass.

  • The Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 150 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 19% (13.7 L/min / 3.6 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
  • The Lamborghini Rubin 150 suits road haulage better on this data: 11% (1,000 kg / 2,205 lb) more maximum permissible mass.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 150 and Lamborghini Rubin 150, with the call on each
QuestionAgrotron 150Rubin 150Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?101.3 kW (135.8 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 150”102.5 kW (137.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Rubin 150”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the Agrotron 150 and the Rubin 150.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the Agrotron 150 and the Rubin 150.
Which pumps more oil for implements?84.2 L/min (22.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 150”70.5 L/min (18.6 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Rubin 150”AheadThe Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 150 has 19% more hydraulic flow (13.7 L/min / 3.6 gpm) than the Lamborghini Rubin 150 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?7,388 kg (16,287 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 150”8,600 kg (18,960 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Rubin 150”Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the Agrotron 150: lift through the full range at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 150”); the Rubin 150: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Rubin 150”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
Which is heavier, for traction?5,390 kg (11,883 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 150”6,845 kg (15,091 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Rubin 150”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Lamborghini Rubin 150 is 27% heavier (1,455 kg / 3,208 lb) than the Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 150 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?9,500 kg (20,944 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 150”10,500 kg (23,149 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Rubin 150”AheadThe Lamborghini Rubin 150 has 11% higher maximum permissible mass (1,000 kg / 2,205 lb) than the Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 150 (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
Which has the wider choice of gears?20 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 150”18 to 27Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Rubin 150”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the Agrotron 150 and the Rubin 150.
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 50 km/h (31.1 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 150”40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Rubin 150”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 150”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Rubin 150”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Rubin 150”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the Agrotron 150.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 150”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Rubin 150”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1997–20001998–2004EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 150 has 19% more hydraulic flow (13.7 L/min / 3.6 gpm) than the Lamborghini Rubin 150 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Lamborghini Rubin 150 is 27% heavier (1,455 kg / 3,208 lb) than the Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 150 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Lamborghini Rubin 150 has 11% higher maximum permissible mass (1,000 kg / 2,205 lb) than the Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 150 (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Not comparable on three-point lift: the Agrotron 150: lift through the full range at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 150”); the Rubin 150: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Rubin 150”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources