Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 120 or Hürlimann SX 1200?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the Agrotron 120 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the SX 1200 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 120 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 32% (2,240 kg / 4,938 lb) more three-point lift.
  • The Hürlimann SX 1200 suits road haulage better on this data: 17% (1,500 kg / 3,307 lb) more maximum permissible mass.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 120 and Hürlimann SX 1200, with the call on each
QuestionAgrotron 120SX 1200Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?88.3 kW (118.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 120”88.3 kW (118.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann SX 1200”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Agrotron 120 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the SX 1200 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the Agrotron 120 and the SX 1200.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the Agrotron 120 and the SX 1200.
Which pumps more oil for implements?72.8 L/min (19.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 120”No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the SX 1200.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?9,240 kg (20,371 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 120”7,000 kg (15,432 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann SX 1200”AheadThe Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 120 has 32% more lift (2,240 kg / 4,938 lb) than the Hürlimann SX 1200 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?5,360 kg (11,817 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 120”6,100 kg (13,448 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann SX 1200”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Hürlimann SX 1200 is 14% heavier (740 kg / 1,631 lb) than the Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 120 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?9,000 kg (19,842 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 120”10,500 kg (23,149 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann SX 1200”AheadThe Hürlimann SX 1200 has 17% higher maximum permissible mass (1,500 kg / 3,307 lb) than the Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 120 (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
Which has the wider choice of gears?20 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 120”18 to 27Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann SX 1200”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the Agrotron 120 and the SX 1200.
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 50 km/h (31.1 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 120”40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann SX 1200”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 120”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann SX 1200”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann SX 1200”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the Agrotron 120.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 120”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann SX 1200”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1997–20001998–2004EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 120 has 32% more lift (2,240 kg / 4,938 lb) than the Hürlimann SX 1200 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The Hürlimann SX 1200 is 14% heavier (740 kg / 1,631 lb) than the Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 120 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Hürlimann SX 1200 has 17% higher maximum permissible mass (1,500 kg / 3,307 lb) than the Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 120 (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Agrotron 120 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the SX 1200 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources