Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 110 or New Holland TM 115 (Traktorenlexikon)?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the Agrotron 110 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the TM 115 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The New Holland TM 115 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 43% (35.3 L/min / 9.3 gpm) more hydraulic flow.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 110 and New Holland TM 115 (Traktorenlexikon), with the call on each
QuestionAgrotron 110TM 115Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?77.3 kW (103.7 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 110”77.2 kW (103.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TM115”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Agrotron 110 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the TM 115 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the Agrotron 110 and the TM 115.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the Agrotron 110 and the TM 115.
Which pumps more oil for implements?83.0 L/min (21.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 110”118.3 L/min (31.3 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TM115”AheadThe New Holland TM 115 has 43% more hydraulic flow (35.3 L/min / 9.3 gpm) than the Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 110 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?6,220 kg (13,713 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 110”6,560 kg (14,462 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TM115”EvenEven on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which is heavier, for traction?5,010 kg (11,045 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 110”5,334 kg (11,759 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TM115”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?8,500 kg (18,739 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 110”8,500 kg (18,739 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TM115”EvenEven on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which has the wider choice of gears?20 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 110”18 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TM115”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the Agrotron 110 and the TM 115.
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 50 km/h (31.1 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 110”40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TM115”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 110”540/540E/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland TM115”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 110”independentTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland TM115”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 110”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland TM115”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1997–20001999–2002EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The New Holland TM 115 has 43% more hydraulic flow (35.3 L/min / 9.3 gpm) than the Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 110 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • Even on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Agrotron 110 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the TM 115 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources