Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 108 or Hürlimann XB 110 MAX?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the Agrotron 108 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the XB 110 MAX has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 108 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 44% (25.4 L/min / 6.7 gpm) more hydraulic flow and 17% (920 kg / 2,028 lb) more three-point lift.
- The Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 108 suits road haulage better on this data: 25% (1,700 kg / 3,748 lb) more maximum permissible mass.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | Agrotron 108 | XB 110 MAX | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 80.2 kW (107.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 108” | 80.2 kW (107.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XB MAX 110” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Agrotron 108 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the XB 110 MAX has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the Agrotron 108 and the XB 110 MAX. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the Agrotron 108 and the XB 110 MAX. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 83.0 L/min (21.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 108” | 57.6 L/min (15.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XB MAX 110” | AheadThe Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 108 has 44% more hydraulic flow (25.4 L/min / 6.7 gpm) than the Hürlimann XB 110 MAX (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 6,220 kg (13,713 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 108” | 5,300 kg (11,684 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XB MAX 110” | AheadThe Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 108 has 17% more lift (920 kg / 2,028 lb) than the Hürlimann XB 110 MAX (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 5,460 kg (12,037 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 108” | 4,100 kg (9,039 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XB MAX 110” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 108 is 33% heavier (1,360 kg / 2,998 lb) than the Hürlimann XB 110 MAX (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 8,500 kg (18,739 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 108” | 6,800 kg (14,991 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XB MAX 110” | AheadThe Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 108 has 25% higher maximum permissible mass (1,700 kg / 3,748 lb) than the Hürlimann XB 110 MAX (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 24Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 108” | 20 to 40Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XB MAX 110” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the Agrotron 108 and the XB 110 MAX. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 40 km/h (24.9 mph) to 50 km/h (31.1 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 108” | 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XB MAX 110” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540 rpm / 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 108” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XB MAX 110” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the Agrotron 108 and the XB 110 MAX. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 108” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XB MAX 110” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 2004 | 2012–2015 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Hürlimann XB 110 MAX is newer: production began 8 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 108 has 44% more hydraulic flow (25.4 L/min / 6.7 gpm) than the Hürlimann XB 110 MAX (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 108 has 17% more lift (920 kg / 2,028 lb) than the Hürlimann XB 110 MAX (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 108 is 33% heavier (1,360 kg / 2,998 lb) than the Hürlimann XB 110 MAX (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 108 has 25% higher maximum permissible mass (1,700 kg / 3,748 lb) than the Hürlimann XB 110 MAX (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
- The Hürlimann XB 110 MAX is newer: production began 8 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Agrotron 108 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the XB 110 MAX has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources