Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 105 MK3 or Massey Ferguson MF 6455 (A)?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the Agrotron 105 MK3 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 6455 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Massey Ferguson MF 6455 (A) suits road haulage better on this data: 12% (900 kg / 1,984 lb) more maximum permissible mass.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 105 MK3 and Massey Ferguson MF 6455 (A), with the call on each
QuestionAgrotron 105 MK3MF 6455 (A)Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?73.6 kW (98.7 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 105 MK3”73.6 kW (98.7 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6455”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Agrotron 105 MK3 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 6455 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the Agrotron 105 MK3 and the MF 6455 (A).
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the Agrotron 105 MK3 and the MF 6455 (A).
Which pumps more oil for implements?83 L/min (21.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 105 MK3”No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the MF 6455 (A).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?6,220 kg (13,713 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 105 MK3”4,060 kg (8,951 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6455”Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the Agrotron 105 MK3: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 105 MK3”); the MF 6455 (A): lift through the full range at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6455”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
Which is heavier, for traction?4,500 kg (9,921 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 105 MK3”4,400 kg (9,700 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6455”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?7,500 kg (16,535 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 105 MK3”8,400 kg (18,519 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6455”AheadThe Massey Ferguson MF 6455 (A) has 12% higher maximum permissible mass (900 kg / 1,984 lb) than the Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 105 MK3 (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
Which has the wider choice of gears?24Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 105 MK3”24 to 32Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6455”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the Agrotron 105 MK3 and the MF 6455 (A).
Which is faster on the road?40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 105 MK3”40 km/h (24.9 mph) to 50 km/h (31.1 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6455”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540 rpm / 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 105 MK3”540 rpm / 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6455”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 105 MK3”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the MF 6455 (A).
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 105 MK3”2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6455”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?2001–20032003–2013EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Massey Ferguson MF 6455 (A) has 12% higher maximum permissible mass (900 kg / 1,984 lb) than the Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 105 MK3 (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Agrotron 105 MK3 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 6455 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • Not comparable on three-point lift: the Agrotron 105 MK3: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 105 MK3”); the MF 6455 (A): lift through the full range at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6455”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources