Deutz-Fahr Agrotrac 110 or ZETOR 10641 (2002-2007)?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the Agrotrac 110 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 10641 (2002-2007) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The ZETOR 10641 (2002-2007) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 14% (8.0 L/min / 2.1 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “similar machines”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | Agrotrac 110 | 10641 (2002-2007) | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 74 kW (99 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotrac 110” | 74.3 kW (99.6 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 10641 (2002-2007)” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Agrotrac 110 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 10641 (2002-2007) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the Agrotrac 110 and the 10641 (2002-2007). |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the Agrotrac 110 and the 10641 (2002-2007). |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 58.0 L/min (15.3 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotrac 110” | 66.0 L/min (17.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 10641 (2002-2007)” | AheadThe ZETOR 10641 (2002-2007) has 14% more hydraulic flow (8.0 L/min / 2.1 gpm) than the Deutz-Fahr Agrotrac 110 (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 4,700 kg (10,362 lb) to 6,200 kg (13,669 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotrac 110” | 5,782 kg (12,747 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 10641 (2002-2007)” | Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the Agrotrac 110: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotrac 110”); the 10641 (2002-2007): lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 10641 (2002-2007)”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 4,320 kg (9,524 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotrac 110” | 4,275 kg (9,425 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 10641 (2002-2007)” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | 7,200 kg (15,873 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 10641 (2002-2007)” | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the Agrotrac 110. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 15Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotrac 110” | 24Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 10641 (2002-2007)” | AheadThe ZETOR 10641 (2002-2007) has 60% more forward gears (9 gears) than the Deutz-Fahr Agrotrac 110 (both forward gears, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the Agrotrac 110 and the 10641 (2002-2007). |
| Which is faster on the road? | 38 km/h (23.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotrac 110” | 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 10641 (2002-2007)” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotrac 110” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor 10641 (2002-2007)” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor 10641 (2002-2007)” | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the Agrotrac 110. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotrac 110” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor 10641 (2002-2007)” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 2004– | 2002–2007 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The ZETOR 10641 (2002-2007) has 14% more hydraulic flow (8.0 L/min / 2.1 gpm) than the Deutz-Fahr Agrotrac 110 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The ZETOR 10641 (2002-2007) has 60% more forward gears (9 gears) than the Deutz-Fahr Agrotrac 110 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Agrotrac 110 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 10641 (2002-2007) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- Not comparable on three-point lift: the Agrotrac 110: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotrac 110”); the 10641 (2002-2007): lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 10641 (2002-2007)”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources