Deutz-Fahr Agrosun 140 or J.I. Case 2294 (DT)?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the Agrosun 140 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 2294 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Deutz-Fahr Agrosun 140 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 19% (865 kg / 1,907 lb) more three-point lift.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | Agrosun 140 | 2294 (DT) | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 103.1 kW (138.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrosun 140” | 103.7 kW (139.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 2294” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Agrosun 140 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 2294 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the Agrosun 140 and the 2294 (DT). |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the Agrosun 140 and the 2294 (DT). |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 64.0 L/min (16.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrosun 140” | — | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the 2294 (DT). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 5,400 kg (11,905 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrosun 140” | 4,535 kg (9,998 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 2294” | AheadThe Deutz-Fahr Agrosun 140 has 19% more lift (865 kg / 1,907 lb) than the J.I. Case 2294 (DT) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 5,090 kg (11,222 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrosun 140” | 6,527 kg (14,390 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 2294” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The J.I. Case 2294 (DT) is 28% heavier (1,437 kg / 3,168 lb) than the Deutz-Fahr Agrosun 140 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 8,500 kg (18,739 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrosun 140” | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 2294 (DT). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 24Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrosun 140” | 12Traktorenlexikon, “Case 2294” | AheadThe Deutz-Fahr Agrosun 140 has 100% more forward gears (12 gears) than the J.I. Case 2294 (DT) (both forward gears, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the Agrosun 140 and the 2294 (DT). |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrosun 140” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 2294” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrosun 140” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case 2294” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrosun 140” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Case 2294” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrosun 140” | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Case 2294” | AheadThe Deutz-Fahr Agrosun 140 is available with four-wheel drive; the J.I. Case 2294 (DT) is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources). |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1998–2004 | 1984–1985 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Deutz-Fahr Agrosun 140 is newer: production began 14 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Deutz-Fahr Agrosun 140 has 19% more lift (865 kg / 1,907 lb) than the J.I. Case 2294 (DT) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The J.I. Case 2294 (DT) is 28% heavier (1,437 kg / 3,168 lb) than the Deutz-Fahr Agrosun 140 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Deutz-Fahr Agrosun 140 has 100% more forward gears (12 gears) than the J.I. Case 2294 (DT) (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
- The Deutz-Fahr Agrosun 140 is available with four-wheel drive; the J.I. Case 2294 (DT) is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
- The Deutz-Fahr Agrosun 140 is newer: production began 14 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Agrosun 140 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 2294 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources