Deutz-Fahr Agrosun 140 or Fiat F-140 DT?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the Agrosun 140 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the F-140 DT has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Fiat F-140 DT suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 22% (1,167 kg / 2,573 lb) more three-point lift.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | Agrosun 140 | F-140 DT | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 103.1 kW (138.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrosun 140” | 103 kW (138 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri F140 DT” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Agrosun 140 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the F-140 DT has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the Agrosun 140 and the F-140 DT. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the Agrosun 140 and the F-140 DT. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 64.0 L/min (16.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrosun 140” | — | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the F-140 DT. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 5,400 kg (11,905 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrosun 140” | 6,567 kg (14,478 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri F140 DT” | AheadThe Fiat F-140 DT has 22% more lift (1,167 kg / 2,573 lb) than the Deutz-Fahr Agrosun 140 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 5,090 kg (11,222 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrosun 140” | 5,615 kg (12,379 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri F140 DT” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Fiat F-140 DT is 10% heavier (525 kg / 1,157 lb) than the Deutz-Fahr Agrosun 140 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 8,500 kg (18,739 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrosun 140” | 8,600 kg (18,960 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri F140 DT” | EvenEven on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 24Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrosun 140” | 24Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri F140 DT” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the Agrosun 140 and the F-140 DT. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrosun 140” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri F140 DT” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrosun 140” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri F140 DT” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrosun 140” | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the F-140 DT. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrosun 140” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri F140 DT” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1998–2004 | 1993–1996 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Deutz-Fahr Agrosun 140 is newer: production began 5 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Fiat F-140 DT has 22% more lift (1,167 kg / 2,573 lb) than the Deutz-Fahr Agrosun 140 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The Fiat F-140 DT is 10% heavier (525 kg / 1,157 lb) than the Deutz-Fahr Agrosun 140 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Deutz-Fahr Agrosun 140 is newer: production began 5 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Agrosun 140 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the F-140 DT has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources