Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 6.71 or Landini 165 DT?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the AgroStar 6.71 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 165 DT has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 6.71 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 34% (21.2 L/min / 5.6 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
  • The Landini 165 DT suits road haulage better on this data: 38% (3,800 kg / 8,378 lb) more maximum permissible mass.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 6.71 and Landini 165 DT, with the call on each
QuestionAgroStar 6.71165 DTCall
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?118 kW (158 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 6.71”117.7 kW (157.8 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini Legend 165”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the AgroStar 6.71 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 165 DT has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the AgroStar 6.71 and the 165 DT.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the AgroStar 6.71 and the 165 DT.
Which pumps more oil for implements?82.7 L/min (21.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 6.71”61.5 L/min (16.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini Legend 165”AheadThe Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 6.71 has 34% more hydraulic flow (21.2 L/min / 5.6 gpm) than the Landini 165 DT (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?8,000 kg (17,637 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 6.71”8,400 kg (18,519 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini Legend 165”EvenEven on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which is heavier, for traction?6,800 kg (14,991 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 6.71”5,880 kg (12,963 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini Legend 165”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 6.71 is 16% heavier (920 kg / 2,028 lb) than the Landini 165 DT (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?10,000 kg (22,046 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 6.71”13,800 kg (30,424 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini Legend 165”AheadThe Landini 165 DT has 38% higher maximum permissible mass (3,800 kg / 8,378 lb) than the Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 6.71 (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
Which has the wider choice of gears?18Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 6.71”36 to 72Traktorenlexikon, “Landini Legend 165”AheadThe Landini 165 DT has 100% more forward gears (18 gears) than the Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 6.71 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the AgroStar 6.71 and the 165 DT.
Which is faster on the road?40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 6.71”40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini Legend 165”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000/750 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 6.71”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Landini Legend 165”AheadThe Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 6.71 offers 750 rpm at the PTO, which the Landini 165 DT does not (as stated by the sources).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 6.71”independentTraktorenlexikon, “Landini Legend 165”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 6.71”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Landini Legend 165”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1993–19971997–2001EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 6.71 has 34% more hydraulic flow (21.2 L/min / 5.6 gpm) than the Landini 165 DT (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 6.71 is 16% heavier (920 kg / 2,028 lb) than the Landini 165 DT (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Landini 165 DT has 38% higher maximum permissible mass (3,800 kg / 8,378 lb) than the Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 6.71 (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
  • The Landini 165 DT has 100% more forward gears (18 gears) than the Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 6.71 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
  • The Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 6.71 offers 750 rpm at the PTO, which the Landini 165 DT does not (as stated by the sources).
  • Even on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the AgroStar 6.71 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 165 DT has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources