Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 6.31 or ZETOR 16045?
Which should you choose?
On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 6.31: hydraulic flow and three-point lift.
- The Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 6.31 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 65% (22.8 L/min / 6.0 gpm) more hydraulic flow and 34% (1,633 kg / 3,600 lb) more three-point lift.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | AgroStar 6.31 | 16045 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 76 kW (102 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 6.31” | 77.1 kW (103.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 16045” | EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the AgroStar 6.31 and the 16045. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the AgroStar 6.31 and the 16045. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 58.0 L/min (15.3 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 6.31” | 35.2 L/min (9.3 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 16045” | AheadThe Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 6.31 has 65% more hydraulic flow (22.8 L/min / 6.0 gpm) than the ZETOR 16045 (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 6,500 kg (14,330 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 6.31” | 4,867 kg (10,730 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 16045” | AheadThe Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 6.31 has 34% more lift (1,633 kg / 3,600 lb) than the ZETOR 16045 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 4,640 kg (10,229 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 6.31” | 4,990 kg (11,001 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 16045” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 8,500 kg (18,739 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 6.31” | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 16045. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 15 to 18Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 6.31” | 12Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 16045” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the AgroStar 6.31 and the 16045. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 6.31” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 16045” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 6.31” | 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor 16045” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 6.31” | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 16045. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 6.31” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor 16045” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1990–1993 | 1980–1984 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 6.31 is newer: production began 10 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 6.31 has 65% more hydraulic flow (22.8 L/min / 6.0 gpm) than the ZETOR 16045 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 6.31 has 34% more lift (1,633 kg / 3,600 lb) than the ZETOR 16045 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 6.31 is newer: production began 10 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (1000 rpm).
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources