Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 6.08 or Massey Ferguson MF 3095 (A)?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the AgroStar 6.08 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 3095 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 6.08 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 24% (1,020 kg / 2,249 lb) more three-point lift.
- The Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 6.08 suits road haulage better on this data: 21% (1,500 kg / 3,307 lb) more maximum permissible mass.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | AgroStar 6.08 | MF 3095 (A) | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 78.8 kW (105.7 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 6.08” | 78.7 kW (105.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3095” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the AgroStar 6.08 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 3095 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the AgroStar 6.08 and the MF 3095 (A). |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the AgroStar 6.08 and the MF 3095 (A). |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 57.5 L/min (15.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 6.08” | — | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the MF 3095 (A). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 5,200 kg (11,464 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 6.08” | 4,180 kg (9,215 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3095” | AheadThe Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 6.08 has 24% more lift (1,020 kg / 2,249 lb) than the Massey Ferguson MF 3095 (A) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 4,540 kg (10,009 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 6.08” | 4,375 kg (9,645 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3095” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 8,500 kg (18,739 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 6.08” | 7,000 kg (15,432 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3095” | AheadThe Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 6.08 has 21% higher maximum permissible mass (1,500 kg / 3,307 lb) than the Massey Ferguson MF 3095 (A) (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 40 to 48Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 6.08” | 32Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3095” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | YesTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 6.08” | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the MF 3095 (A). |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 6.08” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3095” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000/750 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 6.08” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3095” | AheadThe Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 6.08 offers 750 rpm at the PTO, which the Massey Ferguson MF 3095 (A) does not (as stated by the sources). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 6.08” | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the MF 3095 (A). |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 6.08” | 2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3095” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1993–1995 | 1990–1995 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 6.08 has 24% more lift (1,020 kg / 2,249 lb) than the Massey Ferguson MF 3095 (A) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 6.08 has 21% higher maximum permissible mass (1,500 kg / 3,307 lb) than the Massey Ferguson MF 3095 (A) (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
- The Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 6.08 offers 750 rpm at the PTO, which the Massey Ferguson MF 3095 (A) does not (as stated by the sources).
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the AgroStar 6.08 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 3095 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources