Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 4.71 or ZETOR 9641?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the AgroStar 4.71 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 9641 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The ZETOR 9641 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 18% (8.8 L/min / 2.3 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
  • The Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 4.71 suits road haulage better on this data: 12% (800 kg / 1,764 lb) more maximum permissible mass.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 4.71 and ZETOR 9641, with the call on each
QuestionAgroStar 4.719641Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?69.9 kW (93.7 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 4.71”69.9 kW (93.7 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 9641 (1999-2002)”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the AgroStar 4.71 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 9641 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the AgroStar 4.71 and the 9641.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the AgroStar 4.71 and the 9641.
Which pumps more oil for implements?49.2 L/min (13.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 4.71”58.0 L/min (15.3 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 9641 (1999-2002)”AheadThe ZETOR 9641 has 18% more hydraulic flow (8.8 L/min / 2.3 gpm) than the Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 4.71 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?5,200 kg (11,464 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 4.71”5,640 kg (12,434 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 9641 (1999-2002)”EvenEven on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which is heavier, for traction?4,200 kg (9,259 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 4.71”4,430 kg (9,766 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 9641 (1999-2002)”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?7,500 kg (16,535 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 4.71”6,700 kg (14,771 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 9641 (1999-2002)”AheadThe Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 4.71 has 12% higher maximum permissible mass (800 kg / 1,764 lb) than the ZETOR 9641 (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
Which has the wider choice of gears?18Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 4.71”24Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 9641 (1999-2002)”AheadThe ZETOR 9641 has 33% more forward gears (6 gears) than the Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 4.71 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the AgroStar 4.71 and the 9641.
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 4.71”30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 9641 (1999-2002)”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000/750 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 4.71”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor 9641 (1999-2002)”AheadThe Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 4.71 offers 750 rpm at the PTO, which the ZETOR 9641 does not (as stated by the sources).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 4.71”independentTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor 9641 (1999-2002)”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 4.71”Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor 9641 (1999-2002)”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1990–19931999–2002Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The ZETOR 9641 is newer: production began 9 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The ZETOR 9641 has 18% more hydraulic flow (8.8 L/min / 2.3 gpm) than the Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 4.71 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 4.71 has 12% higher maximum permissible mass (800 kg / 1,764 lb) than the ZETOR 9641 (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
  • The ZETOR 9641 has 33% more forward gears (6 gears) than the Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 4.71 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
  • The Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 4.71 offers 750 rpm at the PTO, which the ZETOR 9641 does not (as stated by the sources).
  • The ZETOR 9641 is newer: production began 9 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the AgroStar 4.71 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 9641 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources