Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 4.68 or Lamborghini 874-95 N/DT?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the AgroStar 4.68 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 874-95 N/DT has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 4.68 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 11% (5.0 L/min / 1.3 gpm) more hydraulic flow and 37% (1,025 kg / 2,260 lb) more three-point lift.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 4.68 and Lamborghini 874-95 N/DT, with the call on each
QuestionAgroStar 4.68874-95 N/DTCall
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?67 kW (90 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 4.68”66.9 kW (89.7 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 874-95 N”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the AgroStar 4.68 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 874-95 N/DT has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the AgroStar 4.68 and the 874-95 N/DT.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the AgroStar 4.68 and the 874-95 N/DT.
Which pumps more oil for implements?49.2 L/min (13.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 4.68”44.2 L/min (11.7 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 874-95 N”AheadThe Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 4.68 has 11% more hydraulic flow (5.0 L/min / 1.3 gpm) than the Lamborghini 874-95 N/DT (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?3,800 kg (8,378 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 4.68”2,775 kg (6,118 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 874-95 N”AheadThe Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 4.68 has 37% more lift (1,025 kg / 2,260 lb) than the Lamborghini 874-95 N/DT (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?4,200 kg (9,259 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 4.68”3,180 kg (7,011 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 874-95 N”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 4.68 is 32% heavier (1,020 kg / 2,249 lb) than the Lamborghini 874-95 N/DT (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?7,500 kg (16,535 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 4.68”—No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 874-95 N/DT.
Which has the wider choice of gears?40 to 48Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 4.68”12 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 874-95 N”AheadThe Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 4.68 has 67% more forward gears (16 gears) than the Lamborghini 874-95 N/DT (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
Which offers a creeper range?YesTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 4.68”—No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 874-95 N/DT.
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 4.68”30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 874-95 N”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000/750 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 4.68”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 874-95 N”AheadThe Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 4.68 offers 750 rpm at the PTO, which the Lamborghini 874-95 N/DT does not (as stated by the sources).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 4.68”independentTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 874-95 N”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 4.68”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 874-95 N”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1993–19952004–2007Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Lamborghini 874-95 N/DT is newer: production began 11 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 4.68 has 11% more hydraulic flow (5.0 L/min / 1.3 gpm) than the Lamborghini 874-95 N/DT (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 4.68 has 37% more lift (1,025 kg / 2,260 lb) than the Lamborghini 874-95 N/DT (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 4.68 is 32% heavier (1,020 kg / 2,249 lb) than the Lamborghini 874-95 N/DT (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 4.68 has 67% more forward gears (16 gears) than the Lamborghini 874-95 N/DT (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
  • The Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 4.68 offers 750 rpm at the PTO, which the Lamborghini 874-95 N/DT does not (as stated by the sources).
  • The Lamborghini 874-95 N/DT is newer: production began 11 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the AgroStar 4.68 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 874-95 N/DT has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources