Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 4.68 or John Deere 3050 (A)?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the AgroStar 4.68 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 3050 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The John Deere 3050 (A) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 19% (726 kg / 1,601 lb) more three-point lift.
- The Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 4.68 suits road haulage better on this data: 12% (800 kg / 1,764 lb) more maximum permissible mass.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | AgroStar 4.68 | 3050 (A) | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 67 kW (90 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 4.68” | 67.7 kW (90.8 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 3050” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the AgroStar 4.68 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 3050 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the AgroStar 4.68 and the 3050 (A). |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the AgroStar 4.68 and the 3050 (A). |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 49.2 L/min (13.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 4.68” | 52.3 L/min (13.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 3050” | EvenEven on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 3,800 kg (8,378 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 4.68” | 4,526 kg (9,978 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 3050” | AheadThe John Deere 3050 (A) has 19% more lift (726 kg / 1,601 lb) than the Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 4.68 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 4,200 kg (9,259 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 4.68” | 3,920 kg (8,642 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 3050” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 7,500 kg (16,535 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 4.68” | 6,700 kg (14,771 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 3050” | AheadThe Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 4.68 has 12% higher maximum permissible mass (800 kg / 1,764 lb) than the John Deere 3050 (A) (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 40 to 48Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 4.68” | 8 to 16Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 3050” | AheadThe Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 4.68 has 150% more forward gears (24 gears) than the John Deere 3050 (A) (both forward gears, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers a creeper range? | YesTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 4.68” | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 3050 (A). |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 4.68” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 3050” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000/750 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 4.68” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 3050” | AheadThe Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 4.68 offers 750 rpm at the PTO, which the John Deere 3050 (A) does not (as stated by the sources). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 4.68” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 3050” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 4.68” | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 3050” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1993–1995 | 1986–1993 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 4.68 is newer: production began 7 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The John Deere 3050 (A) has 19% more lift (726 kg / 1,601 lb) than the Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 4.68 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 4.68 has 12% higher maximum permissible mass (800 kg / 1,764 lb) than the John Deere 3050 (A) (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
- The Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 4.68 has 150% more forward gears (24 gears) than the John Deere 3050 (A) (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
- The Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 4.68 offers 750 rpm at the PTO, which the John Deere 3050 (A) does not (as stated by the sources).
- The Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 4.68 is newer: production began 7 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the AgroStar 4.68 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 3050 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources