Deutz-Fahr AgroPrima 4.56 or Renault 113-12 TX?

Which should you choose?

On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the Renault 113-12 TX: three-point lift. On features, the Deutz-Fahr AgroPrima 4.56 is ahead on PTO speeds and drive.

  • The Deutz-Fahr AgroPrima 4.56 suits PTO-driven implements (mowers, balers, pumps) better on this data: offers 750 rpm.
  • The Renault 113-12 TX suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 18% (700 kg / 1,543 lb) more three-point lift.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Deutz-Fahr AgroPrima 4.56 and Renault 113-12 TX, with the call on each
QuestionAgroPrima 4.56113-12 TXCall
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?64 kW (86 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroPrima 4.56”63.8 kW (85.6 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 113-12 TS/TX/RE R7921”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the AgroPrima 4.56 and the 113-12 TX.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the AgroPrima 4.56 and the 113-12 TX.
Which pumps more oil for implements?42.4 L/min (11.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroPrima 4.56”41.8 L/min (11.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 113-12 TS/TX/RE R7921”EvenEven on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?3,800 kg (8,378 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroPrima 4.56”4,500 kg (9,921 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 113-12 TS/TX/RE R7921”AheadThe Renault 113-12 TX has 18% more lift (700 kg / 1,543 lb) than the Deutz-Fahr AgroPrima 4.56 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?3,780 kg (8,333 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroPrima 4.56”4,720 kg (10,406 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 113-12 TS/TX/RE R7921”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Renault 113-12 TX is 25% heavier (940 kg / 2,072 lb) than the Deutz-Fahr AgroPrima 4.56 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?6,600 kg (14,551 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroPrima 4.56”No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 113-12 TX.
Which has the wider choice of gears?15 to 18Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroPrima 4.56”12Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 113-12 TS/TX/RE R7921”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the AgroPrima 4.56 and the 113-12 TX.
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroPrima 4.56”25 km/h (15.5 mph) to 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 113-12 TS/TX/RE R7921”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000/750 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroPrima 4.56”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 113-12 TS/TX/RE R7921”AheadThe Deutz-Fahr AgroPrima 4.56 offers 750 rpm at the PTO, which the Renault 113-12 TX does not (as stated by the sources).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroPrima 4.56”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 113-12 TX.
Which drives on both axles?Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroPrima 4.56”2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 113-12 TS/TX/RE R7921”AheadThe Deutz-Fahr AgroPrima 4.56 is available with four-wheel drive; the Renault 113-12 TX is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
Which is newer, and what about parts?1991–19951981–1986Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Deutz-Fahr AgroPrima 4.56 is newer: production began 10 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Renault 113-12 TX has 18% more lift (700 kg / 1,543 lb) than the Deutz-Fahr AgroPrima 4.56 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The Renault 113-12 TX is 25% heavier (940 kg / 2,072 lb) than the Deutz-Fahr AgroPrima 4.56 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Deutz-Fahr AgroPrima 4.56 offers 750 rpm at the PTO, which the Renault 113-12 TX does not (as stated by the sources).
  • The Deutz-Fahr AgroPrima 4.56 is available with four-wheel drive; the Renault 113-12 TX is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
  • The Deutz-Fahr AgroPrima 4.56 is newer: production began 10 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources