Deutz-Fahr Agroplus 75 or Massey Ferguson MF 5425 (A)?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the Agroplus 75 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 5425 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Massey Ferguson MF 5425 (A) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 42% (1,499 kg / 3,304 lb) more three-point lift.
- The Massey Ferguson MF 5425 (A) suits road haulage better on this data: 22% (1,360 kg / 2,998 lb) more maximum permissible mass.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | Agroplus 75 | MF 5425 (A) | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 55.2 kW (74.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agroplus 75” | 55.2 kW (74.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 5425” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Agroplus 75 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 5425 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the Agroplus 75 and the MF 5425 (A). |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the Agroplus 75 and the MF 5425 (A). |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | — | — | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the Agroplus 75 and the MF 5425 (A). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 3,600 kg (7,937 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agroplus 75” | 5,099 kg (11,240 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 5425” | AheadThe Massey Ferguson MF 5425 (A) has 42% more lift (1,499 kg / 3,304 lb) than the Deutz-Fahr Agroplus 75 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 3,430 kg (7,562 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agroplus 75” | 3,945 kg (8,697 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 5425” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Massey Ferguson MF 5425 (A) is 15% heavier (515 kg / 1,135 lb) than the Deutz-Fahr Agroplus 75 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 6,200 kg (13,669 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agroplus 75” | 7,560 kg (16,667 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 5425” | AheadThe Massey Ferguson MF 5425 (A) has 22% higher maximum permissible mass (1,360 kg / 2,998 lb) than the Deutz-Fahr Agroplus 75 (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 30Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agroplus 75” | 16Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 5425” | AheadThe Deutz-Fahr Agroplus 75 has 88% more forward gears (14 gears) than the Massey Ferguson MF 5425 (A) (both forward gears, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the Agroplus 75 and the MF 5425 (A). |
| Which is faster on the road? | 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agroplus 75” | 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 5425” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agroplus 75” | 540 rpm / 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 5425” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the Agroplus 75 and the MF 5425 (A). |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agroplus 75” | 2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 5425” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1997–2005 | 2003–2011 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Massey Ferguson MF 5425 (A) is newer: production began 6 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Massey Ferguson MF 5425 (A) has 42% more lift (1,499 kg / 3,304 lb) than the Deutz-Fahr Agroplus 75 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The Massey Ferguson MF 5425 (A) is 15% heavier (515 kg / 1,135 lb) than the Deutz-Fahr Agroplus 75 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Massey Ferguson MF 5425 (A) has 22% higher maximum permissible mass (1,360 kg / 2,998 lb) than the Deutz-Fahr Agroplus 75 (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
- The Deutz-Fahr Agroplus 75 has 88% more forward gears (14 gears) than the Massey Ferguson MF 5425 (A) (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
- The Massey Ferguson MF 5425 (A) is newer: production began 6 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Agroplus 75 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 5425 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources