Deutz-Fahr Agroplus 67 or Hürlimann XE 70 Tradition?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the Agroplus 67 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the XE 70 Tradition has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | Agroplus 67 | XE 70 Tradition | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 49.3 kW (66.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agroplus 67” | 49.3 kW (66.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XE 70 Tradition” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Agroplus 67 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the XE 70 Tradition has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the Agroplus 67 and the XE 70 Tradition. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the Agroplus 67 and the XE 70 Tradition. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 54.0 L/min (14.3 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agroplus 67” | — | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the XE 70 Tradition. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 3,000 kg (6,614 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agroplus 67” | 3,000 kg (6,614 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XE 70 Tradition” | EvenEven on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 2,600 kg (5,732 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agroplus 67” | 2,350 kg (5,181 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XE 70 Tradition” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Deutz-Fahr Agroplus 67 is 11% heavier (250 kg / 551 lb) than the Hürlimann XE 70 Tradition (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 4,500 kg (9,921 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agroplus 67” | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the XE 70 Tradition. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 20Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agroplus 67” | 20 to 30Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XE 70 Tradition” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the Agroplus 67 and the XE 70 Tradition. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agroplus 67” | 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XE 70 Tradition” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540 rpm / 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agroplus 67” | 540/540E rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XE 70 Tradition” | AheadThe Deutz-Fahr Agroplus 67 offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Hürlimann XE 70 Tradition does not (as stated by the sources). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agroplus 67” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XE 70 Tradition” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agroplus 67” | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XE 70 Tradition” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 2006–2009 | 2005–2009 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Deutz-Fahr Agroplus 67 is 11% heavier (250 kg / 551 lb) than the Hürlimann XE 70 Tradition (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Deutz-Fahr Agroplus 67 offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Hürlimann XE 70 Tradition does not (as stated by the sources).
- Even on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Agroplus 67 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the XE 70 Tradition has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources