Deutz-Fahr Agroplus 60 (Traktorenlexikon) or New Holland 4135 (A)?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the Agroplus 60 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 4135 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Deutz-Fahr Agroplus 60 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 38% (13.0 L/min / 3.4 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
  • The Deutz-Fahr Agroplus 60 suits road haulage better on this data: 17% (650 kg / 1,433 lb) more maximum permissible mass.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “similar machines”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Deutz-Fahr Agroplus 60 (Traktorenlexikon) and New Holland 4135 (A), with the call on each
QuestionAgroplus 604135 (A)Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?41.2 kW (55.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agroplus 60”40.5 kW (54.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 4135”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Agroplus 60 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 4135 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the Agroplus 60 and the 4135 (A).
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the Agroplus 60 and the 4135 (A).
Which pumps more oil for implements?47.5 L/min (12.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agroplus 60”34.5 L/min (9.1 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 4135”AheadThe Deutz-Fahr Agroplus 60 has 38% more hydraulic flow (13.0 L/min / 3.4 gpm) than the New Holland 4135 (A) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?2,900 kg (6,393 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agroplus 60”3,000 kg (6,614 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 4135”EvenEven on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which is heavier, for traction?2,355 kg (5,192 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agroplus 60”2,635 kg (5,809 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 4135”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The New Holland 4135 (A) is 12% heavier (280 kg / 617 lb) than the Deutz-Fahr Agroplus 60 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?4,500 kg (9,921 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agroplus 60”3,850 kg (8,488 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 4135”AheadThe Deutz-Fahr Agroplus 60 has 17% higher maximum permissible mass (650 kg / 1,433 lb) than the New Holland 4135 (A) (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
Which has the wider choice of gears?20Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agroplus 60”12 to 20Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 4135”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?YesTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland 4135”No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the Agroplus 60.
Which is faster on the road?40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agroplus 60”30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 4135”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agroplus 60”540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland 4135”AheadThe Deutz-Fahr Agroplus 60 offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the New Holland 4135 (A) does not (as stated by the sources).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agroplus 60”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 4135 (A).
Which drives on both axles?2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agroplus 60”2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland 4135”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1997–20051996–1999EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Deutz-Fahr Agroplus 60 has 38% more hydraulic flow (13.0 L/min / 3.4 gpm) than the New Holland 4135 (A) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The New Holland 4135 (A) is 12% heavier (280 kg / 617 lb) than the Deutz-Fahr Agroplus 60 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Deutz-Fahr Agroplus 60 has 17% higher maximum permissible mass (650 kg / 1,433 lb) than the New Holland 4135 (A) (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
  • The Deutz-Fahr Agroplus 60 offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the New Holland 4135 (A) does not (as stated by the sources).
  • Even on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Agroplus 60 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 4135 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources