Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 50 (55) or ZETOR 5213/5243 V/P?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the Agrokid 50 (55) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 5213/5243 V/P has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 50 (55) suits road haulage better on this data: 26% (6.5 km/h / 4.0 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | Agrokid 50 (55) | 5213/5243 V/P | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 34.6 kW (46.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 50” | 33.1 kW (44.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 5213/5243 V/P” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Agrokid 50 (55) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 5213/5243 V/P has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the Agrokid 50 (55) and the 5213/5243 V/P. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the Agrokid 50 (55) and the 5213/5243 V/P. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 30.0 L/min (7.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 50” | 32.2 L/min (8.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 5213/5243 V/P” | EvenEven on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 1,200 kg (2,646 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 50” | — | No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the 5213/5243 V/P. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 1,320 kg (2,910 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 50” | 2,230 kg (4,916 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 5213/5243 V/P” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The ZETOR 5213/5243 V/P is 69% heavier (910 kg / 2,006 lb) than the Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 50 (55) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 2,400 kg (5,291 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 50” | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 5213/5243 V/P. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 12Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 50” | 10Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 5213/5243 V/P” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the Agrokid 50 (55) and the 5213/5243 V/P. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 31.5 km/h (19.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 50” | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 5213/5243 V/P” | AheadThe Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 50 (55) has 26% more top speed (6.5 km/h / 4.0 mph) than the ZETOR 5213/5243 V/P (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540 rpm / 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 50” | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor 5213/5243 V/P” | AheadThe Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 50 (55) offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the ZETOR 5213/5243 V/P does not (as stated by the sources). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the Agrokid 50 (55) and the 5213/5243 V/P. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 50” | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor 5213/5243 V/P” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 2005–2007 | 1990–2004 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 50 (55) is newer: production began 15 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The ZETOR 5213/5243 V/P is 69% heavier (910 kg / 2,006 lb) than the Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 50 (55) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 50 (55) has 26% more top speed (6.5 km/h / 4.0 mph) than the ZETOR 5213/5243 V/P (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- The Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 50 (55) offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the ZETOR 5213/5243 V/P does not (as stated by the sources).
- The Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 50 (55) is newer: production began 15 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Agrokid 50 (55) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 5213/5243 V/P has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources