Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 45 A or John Deere 2000 (A)?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the Agrokid 45 A has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 2000 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The John Deere 2000 (A) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 69% (830 kg / 1,830 lb) more three-point lift.
- The John Deere 2000 (A) suits road haulage better on this data: 129% (3,100 kg / 6,834 lb) more maximum permissible mass and 11% (3.0 km/h / 1.9 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | Agrokid 45 A | 2000 (A) | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 30.9 kW (41.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 45” | 33.1 kW (44.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2000” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Agrokid 45 A has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 2000 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the Agrokid 45 A and the 2000 (A). |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the Agrokid 45 A and the 2000 (A). |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | — | 32.0 L/min (8.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2000” | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the Agrokid 45 A. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 1,200 kg (2,646 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 45” | 2,030 kg (4,475 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2000” | AheadThe John Deere 2000 (A) has 69% more lift (830 kg / 1,830 lb) than the Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 45 A (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 1,010 kg (2,227 lb) to 1,150 kg (2,535 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 45” | 2,895 kg (6,382 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2000” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The John Deere 2000 (A) is 152% heavier (1,745 kg / 3,847 lb) than the Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 45 A (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 2,400 kg (5,291 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 45” | 5,500 kg (12,125 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2000” | AheadThe John Deere 2000 (A) has 129% higher maximum permissible mass (3,100 kg / 6,834 lb) than the Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 45 A (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 12Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 45” | 10Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2000” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the Agrokid 45 A and the 2000 (A). |
| Which is faster on the road? | 27 km/h (16.8 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 45” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2000” | AheadThe John Deere 2000 (A) has 11% more top speed (3.0 km/h / 1.9 mph) than the Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 45 A (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 45” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2000” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 45” | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 2000 (A). |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 45” | 2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2000” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1996–2004 | 1993–1996 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The John Deere 2000 (A) has 69% more lift (830 kg / 1,830 lb) than the Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 45 A (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The John Deere 2000 (A) is 152% heavier (1,745 kg / 3,847 lb) than the Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 45 A (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The John Deere 2000 (A) has 129% higher maximum permissible mass (3,100 kg / 6,834 lb) than the Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 45 A (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
- The John Deere 2000 (A) has 11% more top speed (3.0 km/h / 1.9 mph) than the Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 45 A (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Agrokid 45 A has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 2000 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources