Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 45 A or Ford 2610?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the Agrokid 45 A has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 2610 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Ford 2610 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 18% (213 kg / 470 lb) more three-point lift.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | Agrokid 45 A | 2610 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 30.9 kW (41.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 45” | 30.2 kW (40.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 2610” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Agrokid 45 A has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 2610 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the Agrokid 45 A and the 2610. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the Agrokid 45 A and the 2610. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | — | 21.8 L/min (5.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 2610” | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the Agrokid 45 A. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 1,200 kg (2,646 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 45” | 1,413 kg (3,115 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 2610” | AheadThe Ford 2610 has 18% more lift (213 kg / 470 lb) than the Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 45A (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 1,010 kg (2,227 lb) to 1,150 kg (2,535 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 45” | 1,804 kg (3,977 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 2610” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Ford 2610 is 57% heavier (654 kg / 1,442 lb) than the Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 45A (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 2,400 kg (5,291 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 45” | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 2610. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 12Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 45” | 8Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 2610” | AheadThe Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 45A has 50% more forward gears (4 gears) than the Ford 2610 (both forward gears, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the Agrokid 45 A and the 2610. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 27 km/h (16.8 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 45” | 29 km/h (18.0 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 2610” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 45” | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Ford 2610” | AheadThe Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 45A offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Ford 2610 does not (as stated by the sources). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 45” | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 2610. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 45” | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Ford 2610” | AheadThe Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 45A is available with four-wheel drive; the Ford 2610 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources). |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1996–2004 | 1981–1983 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 45A is newer: production began 15 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Ford 2610 has 18% more lift (213 kg / 470 lb) than the Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 45A (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The Ford 2610 is 57% heavier (654 kg / 1,442 lb) than the Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 45A (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 45A has 50% more forward gears (4 gears) than the Ford 2610 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
- The Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 45A offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Ford 2610 does not (as stated by the sources).
- The Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 45A is available with four-wheel drive; the Ford 2610 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
- The Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 45A is newer: production began 15 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Agrokid 45 A has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 2610 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources