Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 40 (45) or New Holland 3235?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the Agrokid 40 (45) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 3235 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The New Holland 3235 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 41% (490 kg / 1,080 lb) more three-point lift.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | Agrokid 40 (45) | 3235 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 29.4 kW (39.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 40” | 28.7 kW (38.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 3235” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Agrokid 40 (45) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 3235 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the Agrokid 40 (45) and the 3235. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the Agrokid 40 (45) and the 3235. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | — | 35.0 L/min (9.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 3235” | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the Agrokid 40 (45). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 1,200 kg (2,646 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 40” | 1,690 kg (3,726 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 3235” | AheadThe New Holland 3235 has 41% more lift (490 kg / 1,080 lb) than the Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 40 (45) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 1,300 kg (2,866 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 40” | 1,720 kg (3,792 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 3235” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The New Holland 3235 is 32% heavier (420 kg / 926 lb) than the Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 40 (45) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 2,400 kg (5,291 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 40” | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 3235. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 12Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 40” | 12 to 20Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 3235” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | YesTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland 3235” | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the Agrokid 40 (45). |
| Which is faster on the road? | 31.5 km/h (19.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 40” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 3235” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540 rpm / 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 40” | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland 3235” | AheadThe Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 40 (45) offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the New Holland 3235 does not (as stated by the sources). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 40” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland 3235” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 40” | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland 3235” | AheadThe Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 40 (45) is available with four-wheel drive; the New Holland 3235 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources). |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 2005–2007 | 1996–1999 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 40 (45) is newer: production began 9 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The New Holland 3235 has 41% more lift (490 kg / 1,080 lb) than the Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 40 (45) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The New Holland 3235 is 32% heavier (420 kg / 926 lb) than the Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 40 (45) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 40 (45) offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the New Holland 3235 does not (as stated by the sources).
- The Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 40 (45) is available with four-wheel drive; the New Holland 3235 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
- The Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 40 (45) is newer: production began 9 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Agrokid 40 (45) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 3235 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources