Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 30 (35) or Hürlimann Prince 335 DT?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the Agrokid 30 (35) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Prince 335 DT has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Hürlimann Prince 335 DT suits road haulage better on this data: 11% (3.0 km/h / 1.9 mph) more top speed.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 30 (35) and Hürlimann Prince 335 DT, with the call on each
QuestionAgrokid 30 (35)Prince 335 DTCall
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?24.3 kW (32.6 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 30”25.8 kW (34.6 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann Prince 335”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Agrokid 30 (35) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Prince 335 DT has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the Agrokid 30 (35) and the Prince 335 DT.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the Agrokid 30 (35) and the Prince 335 DT.
Which pumps more oil for implements?—8.0 L/min (2.1 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann Prince 335”No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the Agrokid 30 (35).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?1,200.000 kg (2,646 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 30”943 kg (2,079 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann Prince 335”Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the Agrokid 30 (35): lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 30”); the Prince 335 DT: lift through the full range at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann Prince 335”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
Which is heavier, for traction?1,250 kg (2,756 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 30”1,110 kg (2,447 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann Prince 335”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 30 (35) is 13% heavier (140 kg / 309 lb) than the Hürlimann Prince 335 DT (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?2,400 kg (5,291 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 30”—No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the Prince 335 DT.
Which has the wider choice of gears?12Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 30”12Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann Prince 335”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers a creeper range?——No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the Agrokid 30 (35) and the Prince 335 DT.
Which is faster on the road?27 km/h (16.8 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 30”30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann Prince 335”AheadThe Hürlimann Prince 335 DT has 11% more top speed (3.0 km/h / 1.9 mph) than the Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 30 (35) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
Which offers more PTO speeds?1000/2000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 30”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann Prince 335”AheadThe Hürlimann Prince 335 DT offers 540 rpm at the PTO, which the Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 30 (35) does not (as stated by the sources).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?——No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the Agrokid 30 (35) and the Prince 335 DT.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 30”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann Prince 335”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?2005–20071995–1999Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 30 (35) is newer: production began 10 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 30 (35) is 13% heavier (140 kg / 309 lb) than the Hürlimann Prince 335 DT (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Hürlimann Prince 335 DT has 11% more top speed (3.0 km/h / 1.9 mph) than the Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 30 (35) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
  • The Hürlimann Prince 335 DT offers 540 rpm at the PTO, which the Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 30 (35) does not (as stated by the sources).
  • The Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 30 (35) is newer: production began 10 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Agrokid 30 (35) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Prince 335 DT has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • Not comparable on three-point lift: the Agrokid 30 (35): lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 30”); the Prince 335 DT: lift through the full range at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann Prince 335”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources