Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 30 (35) or Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 35 A?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the Agrokid 30 (35) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Agrokid 35 A has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | Agrokid 30 (35) | Agrokid 35 A | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 24.3 kW (32.6 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 30” | 25.8 kW (34.6 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 35” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Agrokid 30 (35) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Agrokid 35 A has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the Agrokid 30 (35) and the Agrokid 35 A. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the Agrokid 30 (35) and the Agrokid 35 A. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | — | — | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the Agrokid 30 (35) and the Agrokid 35 A. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 1,200.000 kg (2,646 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 30” | 1,200.000 kg (2,646 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 35” | EvenEven on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 1,250 kg (2,756 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 30” | 1,030 kg (2,271 lb) to 1,235 kg (2,723 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 35” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 2,400 kg (5,291 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 30” | 2,400 kg (5,291 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 35” | EvenEven on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 12Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 30” | 12Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 35” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the Agrokid 30 (35) and the Agrokid 35 A. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 27 km/h (16.8 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 30” | 27 km/h (16.8 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 35” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 1000/2000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 30” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 35” | AheadThe Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 35A offers 540 rpm at the PTO, which the Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 30 (35) does not (as stated by the sources). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 35” | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the Agrokid 30 (35). |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 30” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 35” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 2005–2007 | 1996–2004 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 30 (35) is newer: production began 9 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 35A offers 540 rpm at the PTO, which the Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 30 (35) does not (as stated by the sources).
- The Deutz-Fahr Agrokid 30 (35) is newer: production began 9 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Agrokid 30 (35) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Agrokid 35 A has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources