Deutz-Fahr Agrofarm 100 or ZETOR Proxima 100 (A)?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the Agrofarm 100 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Proxima 100 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Deutz-Fahr Agrofarm 100 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 15% (7.2 L/min / 1.9 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
- The Deutz-Fahr Agrofarm 100 suits road haulage better on this data: 33% (1,800 kg / 3,968 lb) more maximum permissible mass.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | Agrofarm 100 | Proxima 100 (A) | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 66.2 kW (88.8 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrofarm 100” | 66.2 kW (88.8 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor Proxima 100” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Agrofarm 100 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Proxima 100 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the Agrofarm 100 and the Proxima 100 (A). |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the Agrofarm 100 and the Proxima 100 (A). |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 55.5 L/min (14.7 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrofarm 100” | 48.3 L/min (12.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor Proxima 100” | AheadThe Deutz-Fahr Agrofarm 100 has 15% more hydraulic flow (7.2 L/min / 1.9 gpm) than the ZETOR Proxima 100 (A) (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 4,800 kg (10,582 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrofarm 100” | — | No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the Proxima 100 (A). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 4,300 kg (9,480 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrofarm 100” | 3,350 kg (7,385 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor Proxima 100” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Deutz-Fahr Agrofarm 100 is 28% heavier (950 kg / 2,094 lb) than the ZETOR Proxima 100 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 7,200 kg (15,873 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrofarm 100” | 5,400 kg (11,905 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor Proxima 100” | AheadThe Deutz-Fahr Agrofarm 100 has 33% higher maximum permissible mass (1,800 kg / 3,968 lb) than the ZETOR Proxima 100 (A) (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 20Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrofarm 100” | 10 to 20Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor Proxima 100” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the Agrofarm 100 and the Proxima 100 (A). |
| Which is faster on the road? | 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrofarm 100” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor Proxima 100” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540 rpm / 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrofarm 100” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor Proxima 100” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrofarm 100” | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the Proxima 100 (A). |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrofarm 100” | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor Proxima 100” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 2007–2008 | 2011–2016 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Deutz-Fahr Agrofarm 100 has 15% more hydraulic flow (7.2 L/min / 1.9 gpm) than the ZETOR Proxima 100 (A) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Deutz-Fahr Agrofarm 100 is 28% heavier (950 kg / 2,094 lb) than the ZETOR Proxima 100 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Deutz-Fahr Agrofarm 100 has 33% higher maximum permissible mass (1,800 kg / 3,968 lb) than the ZETOR Proxima 100 (A) (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Agrofarm 100 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Proxima 100 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources