Deutz-Fahr Agrocompact 70 V/F 3 or Deutz-Fahr Agroplus-S 75?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the Agrocompact 70 V/F 3 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Agroplus-S 75 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “similar machines”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | Agrocompact 70 V/F 3 | Agroplus-S 75 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 51.5 kW (69.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrocompact 70 F” | 51.5 kW (69.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agroplus S 75” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Agrocompact 70 V/F 3 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Agroplus-S 75 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the Agrocompact 70 V/F 3 and the Agroplus-S 75. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the Agrocompact 70 V/F 3 and the Agroplus-S 75. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | — | 54.0 L/min (14.3 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agroplus S 75” | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the Agrocompact 70 V/F 3. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 3,000 kg (6,614 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrocompact 70 F” | 3,000 kg (6,614 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agroplus S 75” | Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the Agrocompact 70 V/F 3: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrocompact 70 F”); the Agroplus-S 75: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agroplus S 75”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 2,475 kg (5,456 lb) to 2,525 kg (5,567 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrocompact 70 F” | 2,700 kg (5,952 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agroplus S 75” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the Agrocompact 70 V/F 3 and the Agroplus-S 75. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 20Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrocompact 70 F” | 30Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agroplus S 75” | AheadThe Deutz-Fahr Agroplus-S 75 has 50% more forward gears (10 gears) than the Deutz-Fahr Agrocompact 70 V/F 3 (both forward gears, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | YesTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agroplus S 75” | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the Agrocompact 70 V/F 3. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrocompact 70 F” | 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agroplus S 75” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/540E/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrocompact 70 F” | 540/540E/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agroplus S 75” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the Agrocompact 70 V/F 3 and the Agroplus-S 75. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrocompact 70 F” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agroplus S 75” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1998–2006 | 2005–2007 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Deutz-Fahr Agroplus-S 75 is newer: production began 7 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Deutz-Fahr Agroplus-S 75 has 50% more forward gears (10 gears) than the Deutz-Fahr Agrocompact 70 V/F 3 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
- The Deutz-Fahr Agroplus-S 75 is newer: production began 7 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Agrocompact 70 V/F 3 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Agroplus-S 75 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- Not comparable on three-point lift: the Agrocompact 70 V/F 3: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrocompact 70 F”); the Agroplus-S 75: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agroplus S 75”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources