Deutz-Fahr Agrocompact 60 V/F or New Holland 4635?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the Agrocompact 60 V/F has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 4635 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Deutz-Fahr Agrocompact 60 V/F suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 18% (400 kg / 882 lb) more three-point lift.
- The New Holland 4635 suits road haulage better on this data: 21% (900 kg / 1,984 lb) more maximum permissible mass.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | Agrocompact 60 V/F | 4635 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 44.2 kW (59.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrocompact 60” | 44.2 kW (59.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 4635” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Agrocompact 60 V/F has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 4635 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the Agrocompact 60 V/F and the 4635. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the Agrocompact 60 V/F and the 4635. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 47 L/min (12.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrocompact 60” | 44.5 L/min (11.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 4635” | EvenEven on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 2,600 kg (5,732 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrocompact 60” | 2,200 kg (4,850 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 4635” | AheadThe Deutz-Fahr Agrocompact 60 V/F has 18% more lift (400 kg / 882 lb) than the New Holland 4635 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 2,475 kg (5,456 lb) to 2,525 kg (5,567 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrocompact 60” | 3,940 kg (8,686 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 4635” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The New Holland 4635 is 56% heavier (1,415 kg / 3,120 lb) than the Deutz-Fahr Agrocompact 60 V/F (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 4,300 kg (9,480 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrocompact 60” | 5,200 kg (11,464 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 4635” | AheadThe New Holland 4635 has 21% higher maximum permissible mass (900 kg / 1,984 lb) than the Deutz-Fahr Agrocompact 60 V/F (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 20Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrocompact 60” | 12 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 4635” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | YesTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland 4635” | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the Agrocompact 60 V/F. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 38 km/h (23.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrocompact 60” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 4635” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/540E/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrocompact 60” | 540/540E/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland 4635” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | independentTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland 4635” | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the Agrocompact 60 V/F. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrocompact 60” | 2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland 4635” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1998–2004 | 1996–1998 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Deutz-Fahr Agrocompact 60 V/F has 18% more lift (400 kg / 882 lb) than the New Holland 4635 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The New Holland 4635 is 56% heavier (1,415 kg / 3,120 lb) than the Deutz-Fahr Agrocompact 60 V/F (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The New Holland 4635 has 21% higher maximum permissible mass (900 kg / 1,984 lb) than the Deutz-Fahr Agrocompact 60 V/F (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
- Even on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Agrocompact 60 V/F has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 4635 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources