Deutz-Fahr AgroCompact 3.50 V/F/S or Renault 65-14 MX?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the AgroCompact 3.50 V/F/S has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 65-14 MX has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Deutz-Fahr AgroCompact 3.50 V/F/S suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 33% (10.7 L/min / 2.8 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
- The Renault 65-14 MX suits road haulage better on this data: 38% (1,500 kg / 3,307 lb) more maximum permissible mass.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | AgroCompact 3.50 V/F/S | 65-14 MX | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 44.2 kW (59.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroCompact 3.50” | 44.2 kW (59.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 65-34 ME/MA/MS/MX R3122” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the AgroCompact 3.50 V/F/S has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 65-14 MX has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the AgroCompact 3.50 V/F/S and the 65-14 MX. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the AgroCompact 3.50 V/F/S and the 65-14 MX. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 43.0 L/min (11.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroCompact 3.50” | 32.3 L/min (8.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 65-34 ME/MA/MS/MX R3122” | AheadThe Deutz-Fahr AgroCompact 3.50 V/F/S has 33% more hydraulic flow (10.7 L/min / 2.8 gpm) than the Renault 65-14 MX (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 2,200 kg (4,850 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroCompact 3.50” | — | No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the 65-14 MX. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 2,150 kg (4,740 lb) to 2,450 kg (5,401 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroCompact 3.50” | 3,150 kg (6,945 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 65-34 ME/MA/MS/MX R3122” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Renault 65-14 MX is 29% heavier (700 kg / 1,543 lb) than the Deutz-Fahr AgroCompact 3.50 V/F/S (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 4,000 kg (8,818 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroCompact 3.50” | 5,500 kg (12,125 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 65-34 ME/MA/MS/MX R3122” | AheadThe Renault 65-14 MX has 38% higher maximum permissible mass (1,500 kg / 3,307 lb) than the Deutz-Fahr AgroCompact 3.50 V/F/S (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 16Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroCompact 3.50” | 12 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 65-34 ME/MA/MS/MX R3122” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the AgroCompact 3.50 V/F/S and the 65-14 MX. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 35 km/h (21.7 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroCompact 3.50” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 65-34 ME/MA/MS/MX R3122” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540 rpm / 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroCompact 3.50” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 65-34 ME/MA/MS/MX R3122” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroCompact 3.50” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 65-34 ME/MA/MS/MX R3122” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroCompact 3.50” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 65-34 ME/MA/MS/MX R3122” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1992–1996 | 1989–1993 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Deutz-Fahr AgroCompact 3.50 V/F/S has 33% more hydraulic flow (10.7 L/min / 2.8 gpm) than the Renault 65-14 MX (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Renault 65-14 MX is 29% heavier (700 kg / 1,543 lb) than the Deutz-Fahr AgroCompact 3.50 V/F/S (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Renault 65-14 MX has 38% higher maximum permissible mass (1,500 kg / 3,307 lb) than the Deutz-Fahr AgroCompact 3.50 V/F/S (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the AgroCompact 3.50 V/F/S has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 65-14 MX has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources