Deutz (KHD) D 2506 or Kramer KB 25 L?

Which should you choose?

On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the Deutz D 2506: hydraulic flow. It is also ahead on forward gears.

  • The Deutz D 2506 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 53% (8.5 L/min / 2.2 gpm) more hydraulic flow.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Deutz (KHD) D 2506 and Kramer KB 25 L, with the call on each
QuestionD 2506KB 25 LCall
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?16.5 kW (22.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 2506”16.2 kW (22 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Kramer KB 25 L”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the D 2506 and the KB 25 L.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the D 2506 and the KB 25 L.
Which pumps more oil for implements?24.5 L/min (6.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 2506”16.0 L/min (4.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Kramer KB 25 L”AheadThe Deutz D 2506 has 53% more hydraulic flow (8.5 L/min / 2.2 gpm) than the Kramer KB 25 L (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?1,560 kg (3,439 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 2506”720 kg (1,587 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Kramer KB 25 L”EvenNo call on three-point lift: the sources do not state where the lift was measured, so the difference is not a reliable call.
Which is heavier, for traction?1,710 kg (3,770 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 2506”1,455 kg (3,208 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Kramer KB 25 L”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Deutz D 2506 is 18% heavier (255 kg / 562 lb) than the Kramer KB 25 L (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?2,800 kg (6,173 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 2506”No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the KB 25 L.
Which has the wider choice of gears?8Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 2506”5Traktorenlexikon, “Kramer KB 25 L”AheadThe Deutz D 2506 has 60% more forward gears (3 gears) than the Kramer KB 25 L (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
Which offers a creeper range?YesTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 2506”No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the KB 25 L.
Which is faster on the road?20 km/h (12.4 mph) to 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 2506”20 km/h (12.4 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Kramer KB 25 L”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 2506”586 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Kramer KB 25 L”No figureNo call on PTO speeds: no standard PTO speed stated for the KB 25 L.
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?dependent (stops with the clutch)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 2506”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the KB 25 L.
Which drives on both axles?2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 2506”2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Kramer KB 25 L”EvenEven on drive: all two-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1968–19741954–1955Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Deutz D 2506 is newer: production began 14 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Deutz D 2506 has 53% more hydraulic flow (8.5 L/min / 2.2 gpm) than the Kramer KB 25 L (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Deutz D 2506 is 18% heavier (255 kg / 562 lb) than the Kramer KB 25 L (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Deutz D 2506 has 60% more forward gears (3 gears) than the Kramer KB 25 L (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
  • The Deutz D 2506 is newer: production began 14 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • No call on three-point lift: the sources do not state where the lift was measured, so the difference is not a reliable call.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on drive: all two-wheel drive.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range, PTO speeds and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources