Deutz (KHD) D 6005 or Leyland 262?

Which should you choose?

On performance, no comparable figure differs by more than its threshold: on this data the machines are level. On features, the Leyland 262 is ahead on top speed; the Deutz D 6005 is ahead on drive.

  • The Leyland 262 suits road haulage better on this data: 11% (3.0 km/h / 1.9 mph) more top speed.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Deutz (KHD) D 6005 and Leyland 262, with the call on each
QuestionD 6005262Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?38.9 kW (52.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 6005”39.0 kW (52.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Leyland 262”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the D 6005 and the 262.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the D 6005 and the 262.
Which pumps more oil for implements?—31.3 L/min (8.3 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Leyland 262”No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the D 6005.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?1,900 kg (4,189 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 6005”1,876 kg (4,136 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Leyland 262”Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the D 6005: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 6005”); the 262: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Leyland 262”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
Which is heavier, for traction?2,605 kg (5,743 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 6005”3,050 kg (6,724 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Leyland 262”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Leyland 262 is 17% heavier (445 kg / 981 lb) than the Deutz D 6005 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?5,000 kg (11,023 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 6005”—No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 262.
Which has the wider choice of gears?9Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 6005”9 to 10Traktorenlexikon, “Leyland 262”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?——No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the D 6005 and the 262.
Which is faster on the road?20 km/h (12.4 mph) to 27 km/h (16.8 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 6005”30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Leyland 262”AheadThe Leyland 262 has 11% more top speed (3.0 km/h / 1.9 mph) than the Deutz D 6005 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
Which offers more PTO speeds?540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 6005”540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Leyland 262”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 6005”independentTraktorenlexikon, “Leyland 262”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 6005”2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Leyland 262”AheadThe Deutz D 6005 is available with four-wheel drive; the Leyland 262 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
Which is newer, and what about parts?1966–19671975–1980Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Leyland 262 is newer: production began 9 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Leyland 262 is 17% heavier (445 kg / 981 lb) than the Deutz D 6005 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Leyland 262 has 11% more top speed (3.0 km/h / 1.9 mph) than the Deutz D 6005 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
  • The Deutz D 6005 is available with four-wheel drive; the Leyland 262 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
  • The Leyland 262 is newer: production began 9 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Not comparable on three-point lift: the D 6005: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 6005”); the 262: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Leyland 262”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources