Deutz (KHD) D 5505 or John Deere 1130 (A)?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the D 5505 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 1130 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Deutz D 5505 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 13% (3.0 L/min / 0.8 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
  • The John Deere 1130 (A) suits heavy draft work (ploughing, cultivating) better on this data: four-wheel drive.
  • The Deutz D 5505 suits road haulage better on this data: 11% (400 kg / 882 lb) more maximum permissible mass.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Deutz (KHD) D 5505 and John Deere 1130 (A), with the call on each
QuestionD 55051130 (A)Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?38.1 kW (51.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 5505”37.5 kW (50.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 1130”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the D 5505 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 1130 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the D 5505 and the 1130 (A).
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the D 5505 and the 1130 (A).
Which pumps more oil for implements?27 L/min (7.1 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 5505”24.0 L/min (6.3 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 1130”AheadThe Deutz D 5505 has 13% more hydraulic flow (3.0 L/min / 0.8 gpm) than the John Deere 1130 (A) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?—1,860 kg (4,101 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 1130”No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the D 5505.
Which is heavier, for traction?2,450 kg (5,401 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 5505”2,291 kg (5,051 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 1130”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?3,900 kg (8,598 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 5505”3,500 kg (7,716 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 1130”AheadThe Deutz D 5505 has 11% higher maximum permissible mass (400 kg / 882 lb) than the John Deere 1130 (A) (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
Which has the wider choice of gears?8Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 5505”8 to 16Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 1130”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?YesTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 5505”—No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 1130 (A).
Which is faster on the road?20 km/h (12.4 mph) to 28 km/h (17.4 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 5505”25 km/h (15.5 mph) to 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 1130”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 5505”540 rpm / 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 1130”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 5505”independentTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 1130”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 5505”Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 1130”AheadThe John Deere 1130 (A) is available with four-wheel drive; the Deutz D 5505 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
Which is newer, and what about parts?1965–19671974–1977Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The John Deere 1130 (A) is newer: production began 9 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Deutz D 5505 has 13% more hydraulic flow (3.0 L/min / 0.8 gpm) than the John Deere 1130 (A) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Deutz D 5505 has 11% higher maximum permissible mass (400 kg / 882 lb) than the John Deere 1130 (A) (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
  • The John Deere 1130 (A) is available with four-wheel drive; the Deutz D 5505 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
  • The John Deere 1130 (A) is newer: production began 9 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the D 5505 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 1130 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources