Deutz (KHD) D 5006 V/VA or Hürlimann D-100 S/L?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the D 5006 V/VA has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the D-100 S/L has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Deutz D 5006 V/VA suits road haulage better on this data: 25% (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | D 5006 V/VA | D-100 S/L | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 32.9 kW (44.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 5006 V/VA” | 32.9 kW (44.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann D 100 S/L” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the D 5006 V/VA has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the D-100 S/L has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the D 5006 V/VA and the D-100 S/L. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the D 5006 V/VA and the D-100 S/L. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | — | — | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the D 5006 V/VA and the D-100 S/L. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 1,580 kg (3,483 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 5006 V/VA” | 1,850 kg (4,079 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann D 100 S/L” | Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the D 5006 V/VA: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 5006 V/VA”); the D-100 S/L: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann D 100 S/L”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 1,540 kg (3,395 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 5006 V/VA” | 1,850 kg (4,079 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann D 100 S/L” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Hürlimann D-100 S/L is 20% heavier (310 kg / 683 lb) than the Deutz D 5006 V/VA (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the D 5006 V/VA and the D-100 S/L. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 12Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 5006 V/VA” | 10Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann D 100 S/L” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | YesTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann D 100 S/L” | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the D 5006 V/VA. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 25.0 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 5006 V/VA” | 20 km/h (12.4 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann D 100 S/L” | AheadThe Deutz D 5006 V/VA has 25% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the Hürlimann D-100 S/L (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 5006 V/VA” | 540/1050 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann D 100 S/L” | AheadThe Deutz D 5006 V/VA offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Hürlimann D-100 S/L does not (as stated by the sources). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 5006 V/VA” | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the D-100 S/L. |
| Which drives on both axles? | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 5006 V/VA” | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann D 100 S/L” | AheadThe Deutz D 5006 V/VA is available with four-wheel drive; the Hürlimann D-100 S/L is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources). |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1974– | 1966–1971 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Deutz D 5006 V/VA is newer: production began 8 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Hürlimann D-100 S/L is 20% heavier (310 kg / 683 lb) than the Deutz D 5006 V/VA (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Deutz D 5006 V/VA has 25% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the Hürlimann D-100 S/L (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- The Deutz D 5006 V/VA offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Hürlimann D-100 S/L does not (as stated by the sources).
- The Deutz D 5006 V/VA is available with four-wheel drive; the Hürlimann D-100 S/L is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
- The Deutz D 5006 V/VA is newer: production began 8 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the D 5006 V/VA has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the D-100 S/L has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- Not comparable on three-point lift: the D 5006 V/VA: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 5006 V/VA”); the D-100 S/L: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann D 100 S/L”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources