Deutz (KHD) D 3006 or Ford 1900 (A)?

Which should you choose?

On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the Ford 1900 (A): hydraulic flow. It is also ahead on forward gears and drive.

  • The Ford 1900 (A) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 10% (2.7 L/min / 0.7 gpm) more hydraulic flow.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Deutz (KHD) D 3006 and Ford 1900 (A), with the call on each
QuestionD 30061900 (A)Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?20.3 kW (27.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 3006”19.2 kW (25.7 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 1900”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the D 3006 and the 1900 (A).
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the D 3006 and the 1900 (A).
Which pumps more oil for implements?26.8 L/min (7.1 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 3006”29.5 L/min (7.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 1900”AheadThe Ford 1900 (A) has 10% more hydraulic flow (2.7 L/min / 0.7 gpm) than the Deutz D 3006 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?1,728 kg (3,810 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 1900”No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the D 3006.
Which is heavier, for traction?1,785 kg (3,935 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 3006”1,220 kg (2,690 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 1900”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Deutz D 3006 is 46% heavier (565 kg / 1,246 lb) than the Ford 1900 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?3,000 kg (6,614 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 3006”No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 1900 (A).
Which has the wider choice of gears?8Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 3006”12Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 1900”AheadThe Ford 1900 (A) has 50% more forward gears (4 gears) than the Deutz D 3006 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the D 3006 and the 1900 (A).
Which is faster on the road?20 km/h (12.4 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 3006”22 km/h (13.7 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 1900”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 3006”540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Ford 1900”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the D 3006 and the 1900 (A).
Which drives on both axles?2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 3006”2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Ford 1900”AheadThe Ford 1900 (A) is available with four-wheel drive; the Deutz D 3006 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
Which is newer, and what about parts?1968–19781979–1983Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Ford 1900 (A) is newer: production began 11 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Ford 1900 (A) has 10% more hydraulic flow (2.7 L/min / 0.7 gpm) than the Deutz D 3006 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Deutz D 3006 is 46% heavier (565 kg / 1,246 lb) than the Ford 1900 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Ford 1900 (A) has 50% more forward gears (4 gears) than the Deutz D 3006 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
  • The Ford 1900 (A) is available with four-wheel drive; the Deutz D 3006 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
  • The Ford 1900 (A) is newer: production began 11 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources