Deutz (KHD) D 3005 or Ford 1900 (A)?
Which should you choose?
On performance, no comparable figure differs by more than its threshold: on this data the machines are level. On features, the Ford 1900 (A) is ahead on forward gears and drive.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | D 3005 | 1900 (A) | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 18.8 kW (25.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 3005” | 19.2 kW (25.7 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 1900” | EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the D 3005 and the 1900 (A). |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the D 3005 and the 1900 (A). |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | — | 29.5 L/min (7.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 1900” | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the D 3005. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 1,425 kg (3,142 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 3005” | 1,728 kg (3,810 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 1900” | Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the D 3005: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 3005”); the 1900 (A): lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 1900”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 1,635 kg (3,605 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 3005” | 1,220 kg (2,690 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 1900” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Deutz D 3005 is 34% heavier (415 kg / 915 lb) than the Ford 1900 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 3,000 kg (6,614 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 3005” | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 1900 (A). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 8Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 3005” | 12Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 1900” | AheadThe Ford 1900 (A) has 50% more forward gears (4 gears) than the Deutz D 3005 (both forward gears, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers a creeper range? | YesTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 3005” | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 1900 (A). |
| Which is faster on the road? | 20.0 km/h (12.4 mph) to 25.9 km/h (16.1 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 3005” | 22 km/h (13.7 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 1900” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 3005” | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Ford 1900” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 3005” | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 1900 (A). |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 3005” | 2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Ford 1900” | AheadThe Ford 1900 (A) is available with four-wheel drive; the Deutz D 3005 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources). |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1965–1967 | 1979–1983 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Ford 1900 (A) is newer: production began 14 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Deutz D 3005 is 34% heavier (415 kg / 915 lb) than the Ford 1900 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Ford 1900 (A) has 50% more forward gears (4 gears) than the Deutz D 3005 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
- The Ford 1900 (A) is available with four-wheel drive; the Deutz D 3005 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
- The Ford 1900 (A) is newer: production began 14 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
- Not comparable on three-point lift: the D 3005: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 3005”); the 1900 (A): lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 1900”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources