Deutz (KHD) D 12006 A or Fendt Favorit 612 SA?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the D 12006 A has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Favorit 612 SA has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Deutz D 12006A suits heavy draft work (ploughing, cultivating) better on this data: 16% (630 kg / 1,389 lb) heavier and four-wheel drive.
  • The Deutz D 12006A suits road haulage better on this data: 15% (1,000 kg / 2,205 lb) more maximum permissible mass.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Deutz (KHD) D 12006 A and Fendt Favorit 612 SA, with the call on each
QuestionD 12006 AFavorit 612 SACall
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?88 kW (118 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 12006”88 kW (118 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 612 SA”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the D 12006 A has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Favorit 612 SA has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the D 12006 A and the Favorit 612 SA.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the D 12006 A and the Favorit 612 SA.
Which pumps more oil for implements?——No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the D 12006 A and the Favorit 612 SA.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?2,300 kg (5,071 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 12006”4,800 kg (10,582 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 612 SA”Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the D 12006 A: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 12006”); the Favorit 612 SA: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 612 SA”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
Which is heavier, for traction?4,660 kg (10,274 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 12006”4,030 kg (8,885 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 612 SA”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Deutz D 12006A is 16% heavier (630 kg / 1,389 lb) than the Fendt Favorit 612 SA (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?7,500 kg (16,535 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 12006”6,500 kg (14,330 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 612 SA”AheadThe Deutz D 12006A has 15% higher maximum permissible mass (1,000 kg / 2,205 lb) than the Fendt Favorit 612 SA (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
Which has the wider choice of gears?—16 to 20Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 612 SA”No figureNo call on forward gears: no figure on record for the D 12006 A.
Which offers a creeper range?YesTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 12006”YesTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 612 SA”EvenEven on a creeper range: every machine offers one.
Which is faster on the road?29 km/h (18.0 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 12006”30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 612 SA”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers more PTO speeds?1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 12006”1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 612 SA”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 12006”independentTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 612 SA”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 12006”2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 612 SA”AheadThe Deutz D 12006A is available with four-wheel drive; the Fendt Favorit 612 SA is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
Which is newer, and what about parts?19711974EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Deutz D 12006A is 16% heavier (630 kg / 1,389 lb) than the Fendt Favorit 612 SA (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Deutz D 12006A has 15% higher maximum permissible mass (1,000 kg / 2,205 lb) than the Fendt Favorit 612 SA (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
  • The Deutz D 12006A is available with four-wheel drive; the Fendt Favorit 612 SA is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
  • Even on a creeper range: every machine offers one.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (1000 rpm).
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the D 12006 A has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Favorit 612 SA has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • Not comparable on three-point lift: the D 12006 A: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 12006”); the Favorit 612 SA: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 612 SA”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow and forward gears.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources