DEUTZ-ALLIS 8070 or Renault 180-94 TZ?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 8070 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 180-94 TZ has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The DEUTZ-ALLIS 8070 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 39% (23.4 L/min / 6.2 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
  • The Renault 180-94 TZ suits road haulage better on this data: 33% (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) more top speed.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for DEUTZ-ALLIS 8070 and Renault 180-94 TZ, with the call on each
Question8070180-94 TZCall
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?126.5 kW (169.6 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 8070”125.1 kW (167.8 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 180-94 TZ R3862”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 8070 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 180-94 TZ has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 8070 and the 180-94 TZ.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 8070 and the 180-94 TZ.
Which pumps more oil for implements?83.3 L/min (22.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 8070”59.9 L/min (15.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 180-94 TZ R3862”AheadThe DEUTZ-ALLIS 8070 has 39% more hydraulic flow (23.4 L/min / 6.2 gpm) than the Renault 180-94 TZ (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?3,720 kg (8,201 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 8070”11,020 kg (24,295 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 180-94 TZ R3862”Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the 8070: lift 610 mm behind the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 8070”); the 180-94 TZ: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 180-94 TZ R3862”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
Which is heavier, for traction?7,643 kg (16,850 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 8070”6,237 kg (13,750 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 180-94 TZ R3862”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The DEUTZ-ALLIS 8070 is 23% heavier (1,406 kg / 3,100 lb) than the Renault 180-94 TZ (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?9,750 kg (21,495 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 180-94 TZ R3862”No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 8070.
Which has the wider choice of gears?12 to 20Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 8070”27Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 180-94 TZ R3862”AheadThe Renault 180-94 TZ has 35% more forward gears (7 gears) than the DEUTZ-ALLIS 8070 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 8070 and the 180-94 TZ.
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 8070”40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 180-94 TZ R3862”AheadThe Renault 180-94 TZ has 33% more top speed (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) than the DEUTZ-ALLIS 8070 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
Which offers more PTO speeds?1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 8070”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 180-94 TZ R3862”AheadThe Renault 180-94 TZ offers 540 rpm at the PTO, which the DEUTZ-ALLIS 8070 does not (as stated by the sources).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 8070”independentTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 180-94 TZ R3862”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 8070”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 180-94 TZ R3862”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1985–19881991–1997Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Renault 180-94 TZ is newer: production began 6 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The DEUTZ-ALLIS 8070 has 39% more hydraulic flow (23.4 L/min / 6.2 gpm) than the Renault 180-94 TZ (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The DEUTZ-ALLIS 8070 is 23% heavier (1,406 kg / 3,100 lb) than the Renault 180-94 TZ (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Renault 180-94 TZ has 35% more forward gears (7 gears) than the DEUTZ-ALLIS 8070 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
  • The Renault 180-94 TZ has 33% more top speed (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) than the DEUTZ-ALLIS 8070 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
  • The Renault 180-94 TZ offers 540 rpm at the PTO, which the DEUTZ-ALLIS 8070 does not (as stated by the sources).
  • The Renault 180-94 TZ is newer: production began 6 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 8070 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 180-94 TZ has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • Not comparable on three-point lift: the 8070: lift 610 mm behind the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 8070”); the 180-94 TZ: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 180-94 TZ R3862”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources