DEUTZ-ALLIS 6275 or John Deere 2400 (A)?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 6275 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 2400 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The John Deere 2400 (A) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 22% (721 kg / 1,590 lb) more three-point lift.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for DEUTZ-ALLIS 6275 and John Deere 2400 (A), with the call on each
Question62752400 (A)Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?54.4 kW (73.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 6275”54.5 kW (73.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2400”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 6275 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 2400 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 6275 and the 2400 (A).
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 6275 and the 2400 (A).
Which pumps more oil for implements?43.1 L/min (11.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 6275”40.0 L/min (10.6 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2400”EvenEven on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?3,299 kg (7,273 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 6275”4,020 kg (8,863 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2400”AheadThe John Deere 2400 (A) has 22% more lift (721 kg / 1,590 lb) than the DEUTZ-ALLIS 6275 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?3,550 kg (7,826 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 6275”3,200 kg (7,055 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2400”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The DEUTZ-ALLIS 6275 is 11% heavier (350 kg / 772 lb) than the John Deere 2400 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?—5,600 kg (12,346 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2400”No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 6275.
Which has the wider choice of gears?12Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 6275”20Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2400”AheadThe John Deere 2400 (A) has 67% more forward gears (8 gears) than the DEUTZ-ALLIS 6275 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
Which offers a creeper range?——No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 6275 and the 2400 (A).
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 6275”30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2400”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 6275”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2400”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 6275”—No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 2400 (A).
Which drives on both axles?Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 6275”Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2400”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1986–19901993–1996Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The John Deere 2400 (A) is newer: production began 7 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The John Deere 2400 (A) has 22% more lift (721 kg / 1,590 lb) than the DEUTZ-ALLIS 6275 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The DEUTZ-ALLIS 6275 is 11% heavier (350 kg / 772 lb) than the John Deere 2400 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The John Deere 2400 (A) has 67% more forward gears (8 gears) than the DEUTZ-ALLIS 6275 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
  • The John Deere 2400 (A) is newer: production began 7 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 6275 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 2400 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources