DEUTZ-ALLIS 6265 or John Deere 2550 (A)?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 6265 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 2550 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The John Deere 2550 (A) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 21% (8.7 L/min / 2.3 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 6265 | 2550 (A) | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 48.5 kW (65.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 6265” | 48.6 kW (65.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2550” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 6265 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 2550 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 6265 and the 2550 (A). |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 6265 and the 2550 (A). |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 40.5 L/min (10.7 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 6265” | 49.2 L/min (13.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2550” | AheadThe John Deere 2550 (A) has 21% more hydraulic flow (8.7 L/min / 2.3 gpm) than the DEUTZ-ALLIS 6265 (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 2,600 kg (5,732 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 6265” | 2,670 kg (5,886 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2550” | EvenEven on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 3,550 kg (7,826 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 6265” | 3,460 kg (7,628 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2550” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | 4,800 kg (10,582 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2550” | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 6265. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 12Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 6265” | 8 to 16Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2550” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 6265 and the 2550 (A). |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 6265” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2550” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 6265” | 540 rpm / 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2550” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 6265” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2550” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 6265” | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2550” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1986–1989 | 1983–1986 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The John Deere 2550 (A) has 21% more hydraulic flow (8.7 L/min / 2.3 gpm) than the DEUTZ-ALLIS 6265 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- Even on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 6265 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 2550 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources