DEUTZ-ALLIS 6060 or Renault 42-70 F?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 6060 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 42-70 F has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The DEUTZ-ALLIS 6060 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 145% (42.5 L/min / 11.2 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
- The DEUTZ-ALLIS 6060 suits heavy draft work (ploughing, cultivating) better on this data: 49% (855 kg / 1,885 lb) heavier and four-wheel drive.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 6060 | 42-70 F | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 47.8 kW (64.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 6060” | 47.8 kW (64.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 42-70 F R7396” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 6060 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 42-70 F has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 6060 and the 42-70 F. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 6060 and the 42-70 F. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 71.9 L/min (19.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 6060” | 29.4 L/min (7.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 42-70 F R7396” | AheadThe DEUTZ-ALLIS 6060 has 145% more hydraulic flow (42.5 L/min / 11.2 gpm) than the Renault 42-70F (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 1,588 kg (3,501 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 6060” | 2,550 kg (5,622 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 42-70 F R7396” | Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the 6060: lift 610 mm behind the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 6060”); the 42-70 F: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 42-70 F R7396”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 2,585 kg (5,699 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 6060” | 1,730 kg (3,814 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 42-70 F R7396” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The DEUTZ-ALLIS 6060 is 49% heavier (855 kg / 1,885 lb) than the Renault 42-70F (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 6060 and the 42-70 F. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 8Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 6060” | 10Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 42-70 F R7396” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 6060 and the 42-70 F. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 6060” | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 42-70 F R7396” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 6060” | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 42-70 F R7396” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 6060” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 42-70 F R7396” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 6060” | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 42-70 F R7396” | AheadThe DEUTZ-ALLIS 6060 is available with four-wheel drive; the Renault 42-70F is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources). |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1985–1988 | 1984–1986 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The DEUTZ-ALLIS 6060 has 145% more hydraulic flow (42.5 L/min / 11.2 gpm) than the Renault 42-70F (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The DEUTZ-ALLIS 6060 is 49% heavier (855 kg / 1,885 lb) than the Renault 42-70F (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The DEUTZ-ALLIS 6060 is available with four-wheel drive; the Renault 42-70F is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 6060 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 42-70 F has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- Not comparable on three-point lift: the 6060: lift 610 mm behind the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 6060”); the 42-70 F: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 42-70 F R7396”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources