DEUTZ-ALLIS 6035 or Hermann Lanz D 634?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 6035 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the D 634 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Hermann Lanz D 634 suits road haulage better on this data: 12% (3.1 km/h / 1.9 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 6035 | D 634 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 24.6 kW (33.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 6035” | 24.9 kW (33.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “HELA D634” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 6035 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the D 634 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 6035 and the D 634. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 6035 and the D 634. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | — | — | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the 6035 and the D 634. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 1,900 kg (4,189 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 6035” | 1,850 kg (4,079 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “HELA D634” | EvenEven on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 1,930 kg (4,255 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 6035” | 1,780 kg (3,924 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “HELA D634” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 3,200 kg (7,055 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 6035” | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the D 634. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 8Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 6035” | 8Traktorenlexikon, “HELA D634” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | YesTraktorenlexikon, “HELA D634” | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 6035. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 6035” | 28.1 km/h (17.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “HELA D634” | AheadThe Hermann Lanz D 634 has 12% more top speed (3.1 km/h / 1.9 mph) than the DEUTZ-ALLIS 6035 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 6035” | 580/1120 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “HELA D634” | No figureNo call on PTO speeds: no standard PTO speed stated for the D 634. |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 6035” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “HELA D634” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 6035” | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “HELA D634” | EvenEven on drive: all two-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1986 | 1974–1978 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The DEUTZ-ALLIS 6035 is newer: production began 12 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Hermann Lanz D 634 has 12% more top speed (3.1 km/h / 1.9 mph) than the DEUTZ-ALLIS 6035 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- The DEUTZ-ALLIS 6035 is newer: production began 12 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Even on drive: all two-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 6035 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the D 634 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO speeds.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources