DEUTZ-ALLIS 6035 or Ford 1910 (A)?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 6035 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 1910 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The DEUTZ-ALLIS 6035 suits road haulage better on this data: 25% (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 6035 | 1910 (A) | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 24.6 kW (33.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 6035” | 23.5 kW (31.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 1910” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 6035 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 1910 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 6035 and the 1910 (A). |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 6035 and the 1910 (A). |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | — | 32.5 L/min (8.6 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 1910” | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the 6035. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 1,900 kg (4,189 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 6035” | 1,731 kg (3,816 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 1910” | EvenEven on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 1,930 kg (4,255 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 6035” | 1,379 kg (3,040 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 1910” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The DEUTZ-ALLIS 6035 is 40% heavier (551 kg / 1,215 lb) than the Ford 1910 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 3,200 kg (7,055 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 6035” | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 1910 (A). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 8Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 6035” | 12Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 1910” | AheadThe Ford 1910 (A) has 50% more forward gears (4 gears) than the DEUTZ-ALLIS 6035 (both forward gears, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 6035 and the 1910 (A). |
| Which is faster on the road? | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 6035” | 20 km/h (12.4 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 1910” | AheadThe DEUTZ-ALLIS 6035 has 25% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the Ford 1910 (A) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 6035” | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Ford 1910” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 6035” | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 1910 (A). |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Allis 6035” | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Ford 1910” | AheadThe Ford 1910 (A) is available with four-wheel drive; the DEUTZ-ALLIS 6035 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources). |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1986 | 1983–1986 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The DEUTZ-ALLIS 6035 is 40% heavier (551 kg / 1,215 lb) than the Ford 1910 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Ford 1910 (A) has 50% more forward gears (4 gears) than the DEUTZ-ALLIS 6035 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
- The DEUTZ-ALLIS 6035 has 25% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the Ford 1910 (A) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- The Ford 1910 (A) is available with four-wheel drive; the DEUTZ-ALLIS 6035 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
- Even on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 6035 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 1910 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources