Deuliewag D 35 or Steyr 190?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the D 35 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 190 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Steyr 190 suits road haulage better on this data: 36% (8.0 km/h / 5.0 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | D 35 | 190 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 26.48 kW (35.51 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Deuliewag D 33” | 26.5 kW (35.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 190” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the D 35 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 190 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the D 35 and the 190. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the D 35 and the 190. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | — | — | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the D 35 and the 190. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | — | 1,500 kg (3,307 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 190” | No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the D 35. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 2,250 kg (4,960 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deuliewag D 33” | 1,690 kg (3,726 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 190” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Deuliewag D 35 is 33% heavier (560 kg / 1,235 lb) than the Steyr 190 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the D 35 and the 190. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 5Traktorenlexikon, “Deuliewag D 33” | 8Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 190” | AheadThe Steyr 190 has 60% more forward gears (3 gears) than the Deuliewag D 35 (both forward gears, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the D 35 and the 190. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 22 km/h (13.7 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Deuliewag D 33” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 190” | AheadThe Steyr 190 has 36% more top speed (8.0 km/h / 5.0 mph) than the Deuliewag D 35 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Deuliewag D 33” | 587 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Steyr 190” | No figureNo call on PTO speeds: no standard PTO speed stated for the 190. |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the D 35 and the 190. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Deuliewag D 33” | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Steyr 190” | EvenEven on drive: all two-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1949–1952 | 1964–1966 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Steyr 190 is newer: production began 15 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Deuliewag D 35 is 33% heavier (560 kg / 1,235 lb) than the Steyr 190 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Steyr 190 has 60% more forward gears (3 gears) than the Deuliewag D 35 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
- The Steyr 190 has 36% more top speed (8.0 km/h / 5.0 mph) than the Deuliewag D 35 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- The Steyr 190 is newer: production began 15 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on drive: all two-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the D 35 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 190 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range, PTO speeds and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources