David Brown 995 or Massey Ferguson MF 265?

Which should you choose?

On performance, no comparable figure differs by more than its threshold: on this data the machines are level. On features, the Massey Ferguson 265 is ahead on PTO speeds and drive.

  • The Massey Ferguson 265 suits PTO-driven implements (mowers, balers, pumps) better on this data: offers 1000 rpm.
  • The Massey Ferguson 265 suits heavy draft work (ploughing, cultivating) better on this data: four-wheel drive.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for David Brown 995 and Massey Ferguson MF 265, with the call on each
Question995MF 265Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?38.7 kW (51.9 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 995”38.5 kW (51.7 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 265”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 995 and the MF 265.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 995 and the MF 265.
Which pumps more oil for implements?28.2 L/min (7.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 995”26.5 L/min (7.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 265”EvenEven on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?—1,800 kg (3,968 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 265”No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the 995.
Which is heavier, for traction?2,610 kg (5,754 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 995”2,630 kg (5,798 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 265”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?——No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 995 and the MF 265.
Which has the wider choice of gears?12Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 995”8 to 12Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 265”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?——No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 995 and the MF 265.
Which is faster on the road?25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 995”25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 265”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “David Brown 995”540 rpm / 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 265”AheadThe Massey Ferguson 265 offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the David Brown 995 does not (as stated by the sources).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?—independentTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 265”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 995.
Which drives on both axles?2WDTraktorenlexikon, “David Brown 995”Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 265”AheadThe Massey Ferguson 265 is available with four-wheel drive; the David Brown 995 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
Which is newer, and what about parts?1971–19761975–1985EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Massey Ferguson 265 offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the David Brown 995 does not (as stated by the sources).
  • The Massey Ferguson 265 is available with four-wheel drive; the David Brown 995 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources