David Brown 995 or David Brown 996 (A)?
Which should you choose?
On performance, no comparable figure differs by more than its threshold: on this data the machines are level. On features, the David Brown 996 (A) is ahead on drive.
- The David Brown 996 (A) suits heavy draft work (ploughing, cultivating) better on this data: four-wheel drive.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 995 | 996 (A) | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 38.7 kW (51.9 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 995” | 38.7 kW (51.9 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 996” | EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 995 and the 996 (A). |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 995 and the 996 (A). |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 28.2 L/min (7.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 995” | 28.2 L/min (7.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 996” | EvenEven on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | — | — | No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the 995 and the 996 (A). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 2,610 kg (5,754 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 995” | 2,610 kg (5,754 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 996” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 995 and the 996 (A). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 12Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 995” | 12Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 996” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 995 and the 996 (A). |
| Which is faster on the road? | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 995” | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 996” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “David Brown 995” | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “David Brown 996” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | independentTraktorenlexikon, “David Brown 996” | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 995. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “David Brown 995” | 2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “David Brown 996” | AheadThe David Brown 996 (A) is available with four-wheel drive; the David Brown 995 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources). |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1971–1976 | 1971–1976 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The David Brown 996 (A) is available with four-wheel drive; the David Brown 995 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
- Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
- Even on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources