David Brown 990 Implematic or International Harvester 504?

Which should you choose?

On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the International Harvester 504: hydraulic flow. It is also ahead on top speed.

  • The International Harvester 504 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 100% (22.8 L/min / 6.0 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
  • The International Harvester 504 suits road haulage better on this data: 36% (8.0 km/h / 5.0 mph) more top speed.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “similar machines”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for David Brown 990 Implematic and International Harvester 504, with the call on each
Question990 Implematic504Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?33.1 kW (44.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 990 Implematic”32.9 kW (44.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 504”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 990 Implematic and the 504.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 990 Implematic and the 504.
Which pumps more oil for implements?22.7 L/min (6.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 990 Implematic”45.5 L/min (12.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 504”AheadThe International Harvester 504 has 100% more hydraulic flow (22.8 L/min / 6.0 gpm) than the David Brown 990 Implematic (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?825 kg (1,819 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 990 Implematic”No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the 504.
Which is heavier, for traction?2,164 kg (4,771 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 990 Implematic”2,022 kg (4,458 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 504”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 990 Implematic and the 504.
Which has the wider choice of gears?6 to 12Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 990 Implematic”5 to 10Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 504”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 990 Implematic and the 504.
Which is faster on the road?22 km/h (13.7 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 990 Implematic”30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 504”AheadThe International Harvester 504 has 36% more top speed (8.0 km/h / 5.0 mph) than the David Brown 990 Implematic (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
Which offers more PTO speeds?540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “David Brown 990 Implematic”540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “IHC 504”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?dependent (stops with the clutch)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 504”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 990 Implematic.
Which drives on both axles?2WDTraktorenlexikon, “David Brown 990 Implematic”2WDTraktorenlexikon, “IHC 504”EvenEven on drive: all two-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1961–19651961–1968EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The International Harvester 504 has 100% more hydraulic flow (22.8 L/min / 6.0 gpm) than the David Brown 990 Implematic (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The International Harvester 504 has 36% more top speed (8.0 km/h / 5.0 mph) than the David Brown 990 Implematic (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
  • Even on drive: all two-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources