David Brown 990 (A) or OLIVER 1355 (4 WD)?

Which should you choose?

On performance, no comparable figure differs by more than its threshold: on this data the machines are level.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for David Brown 990 (A) and OLIVER 1355 (4 WD), with the call on each
Question990 (A)1355 (4 WD)Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?34.9 kW (46.8 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 900 Synchromesh”35.1 kW (47.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Oliver 1355”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 990 (A) and the 1355 (4 WD).
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 990 (A) and the 1355 (4 WD).
Which pumps more oil for implements?21.8 L/min (5.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Oliver 1355”No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the 990 (A).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?1,928 kg (4,251 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 900 Synchromesh”No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the 1355 (4 WD).
Which is heavier, for traction?2,585 kg (5,699 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 900 Synchromesh”2,000 kg (4,409 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Oliver 1355”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The David Brown 990 (A) is 29% heavier (585 kg / 1,290 lb) than the OLIVER 1355 (4 WD) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 990 (A) and the 1355 (4 WD).
Which has the wider choice of gears?12Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 900 Synchromesh”8 to 12Traktorenlexikon, “Oliver 1355”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 990 (A) and the 1355 (4 WD).
Which is faster on the road?25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 900 Synchromesh”25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Oliver 1355”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “David Brown 900 Synchromesh”540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Oliver 1355”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “David Brown 900 Synchromesh”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 1355 (4 WD).
Which drives on both axles?2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “David Brown 900 Synchromesh”Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Oliver 1355”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1971–19761969–1971EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The David Brown 990 (A) is 29% heavier (585 kg / 1,290 lb) than the OLIVER 1355 (4 WD) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources