David Brown 990 (A) or J.I. Case 630?

Which should you choose?

On performance, no comparable figure differs by more than its threshold: on this data the machines are level. On features, the David Brown 990 (A) is ahead on drive.

  • The David Brown 990 (A) suits heavy draft work (ploughing, cultivating) better on this data: 23% (482 kg / 1,063 lb) heavier and four-wheel drive.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for David Brown 990 (A) and J.I. Case 630, with the call on each
Question990 (A)630Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?34.9 kW (46.8 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 900 Synchromesh”35.4 kW (47.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 630”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 990 (A) and the 630.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 990 (A) and the 630.
Which pumps more oil for implements?35.2 L/min (9.3 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 630”No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the 990 (A).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?1,928 kg (4,251 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 900 Synchromesh”No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the 630.
Which is heavier, for traction?2,585 kg (5,699 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 900 Synchromesh”2,103 kg (4,636 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 630”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The David Brown 990 (A) is 23% heavier (482 kg / 1,063 lb) than the J.I. Case 630 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 990 (A) and the 630.
Which has the wider choice of gears?12Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 900 Synchromesh”4 to 12Traktorenlexikon, “Case 630”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 990 (A) and the 630.
Which is faster on the road?25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 900 Synchromesh”20 km/h (12.4 mph) to 35 km/h (21.7 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 630”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “David Brown 900 Synchromesh”540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case 630”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “David Brown 900 Synchromesh”independentTraktorenlexikon, “Case 630”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “David Brown 900 Synchromesh”2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Case 630”AheadThe David Brown 990 (A) is available with four-wheel drive; the J.I. Case 630 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
Which is newer, and what about parts?1971–19761960–1969Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The David Brown 990 (A) is newer: production began 11 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The David Brown 990 (A) is 23% heavier (482 kg / 1,063 lb) than the J.I. Case 630 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The David Brown 990 (A) is available with four-wheel drive; the J.I. Case 630 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
  • The David Brown 990 (A) is newer: production began 11 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources