David Brown 990 (A) or Hürlimann H-360 (A)?

Which should you choose?

On performance, no comparable figure differs by more than its threshold: on this data the machines are level. On features, the Hürlimann H-360 (A) is ahead on PTO speeds.

  • The Hürlimann H-360 (A) suits PTO-driven implements (mowers, balers, pumps) better on this data: offers 1000 rpm.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for David Brown 990 (A) and Hürlimann H-360 (A), with the call on each
Question990 (A)H-360 (A)Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?34.9 kW (46.8 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 900 Synchromesh”34.9 kW (46.8 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 360”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 990 (A) and the H-360 (A).
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 990 (A) and the H-360 (A).
Which pumps more oil for implements?33.8 L/min (8.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 360”No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the 990 (A).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?1,928 kg (4,251 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 900 Synchromesh”1,764 kg (3,889 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 360”Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the 990 (A): lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 900 Synchromesh”); the H-360 (A): lift through the full range at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 360”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
Which is heavier, for traction?2,585 kg (5,699 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 900 Synchromesh”2,340 kg (5,159 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 360”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The David Brown 990 (A) is 10% heavier (245 kg / 540 lb) than the Hürlimann H-360 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 990 (A) and the H-360 (A).
Which has the wider choice of gears?12Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 900 Synchromesh”12Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 360”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 990 (A) and the H-360 (A).
Which is faster on the road?25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 900 Synchromesh”25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 360”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “David Brown 900 Synchromesh”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 360”AheadThe Hürlimann H-360 (A) offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the David Brown 990 (A) does not (as stated by the sources).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “David Brown 900 Synchromesh”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the H-360 (A).
Which drives on both axles?2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “David Brown 900 Synchromesh”2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 360”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1971–19761979–1983Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Hürlimann H-360 (A) is newer: production began 8 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The David Brown 990 (A) is 10% heavier (245 kg / 540 lb) than the Hürlimann H-360 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Hürlimann H-360 (A) offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the David Brown 990 (A) does not (as stated by the sources).
  • The Hürlimann H-360 (A) is newer: production began 8 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on three-point lift: the 990 (A): lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 900 Synchromesh”); the H-360 (A): lift through the full range at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 360”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources