David Brown 885 or J.I. Case 540?

Which should you choose?

On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the J.I. Case 540: hydraulic flow.

  • The J.I. Case 540 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 25% (7.0 L/min / 1.8 gpm) more hydraulic flow.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for David Brown 885 and J.I. Case 540, with the call on each
Question885540Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?28.5 kW (38.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 885”28.5 kW (38.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 540”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 885 and the 540.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 885 and the 540.
Which pumps more oil for implements?28.2 L/min (7.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 885”35.2 L/min (9.3 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 540”AheadThe J.I. Case 540 has 25% more hydraulic flow (7.0 L/min / 1.8 gpm) than the David Brown 885 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?1,565 kg (3,450 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 885”—No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the 540.
Which is heavier, for traction?2,125 kg (4,685 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 885”1,814 kg (3,999 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 540”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The David Brown 885 is 17% heavier (311 kg / 686 lb) than the J.I. Case 540 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?——No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 885 and the 540.
Which has the wider choice of gears?12Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 885”4 to 12Traktorenlexikon, “Case 540”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?——No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 885 and the 540.
Which is faster on the road?26.4 km/h (16.4 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 885”20 km/h (12.4 mph) to 35 km/h (21.7 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 540”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “David Brown 885”540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case 540”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “David Brown 885”—No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 540.
Which drives on both axles?2WDTraktorenlexikon, “David Brown 885”2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Case 540”EvenEven on drive: all two-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1971–19761960–1969Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The David Brown 885 is newer: production began 11 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The J.I. Case 540 has 25% more hydraulic flow (7.0 L/min / 1.8 gpm) than the David Brown 885 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The David Brown 885 is 17% heavier (311 kg / 686 lb) than the J.I. Case 540 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The David Brown 885 is newer: production began 11 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
  • Even on drive: all two-wheel drive.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources