David Brown 880 Selectamatic or Steyr 548 (a)?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 880 Selectamatic has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 548 (a) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Steyr 548 (a) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 41% (535 kg / 1,179 lb) more three-point lift.
- The Steyr 548 (a) suits heavy draft work (ploughing, cultivating) better on this data: four-wheel drive.
- The Steyr 548 (a) suits road haulage better on this data: 20% (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 880 Selectamatic | 548 (a) | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 34.3 kW (46.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 880 Selectamatic” | 34.6 kW (46.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 548” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 880 Selectamatic has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 548 (a) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 880 Selectamatic and the 548 (a). |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 880 Selectamatic and the 548 (a). |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 27.5 L/min (7.3 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 880 Selectamatic” | — | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the 548 (a). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 1,315 kg (2,899 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 880 Selectamatic” | 1,850 kg (4,079 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 548” | AheadThe Steyr 548 (a) has 41% more lift (535 kg / 1,179 lb) than the David Brown 880 Selectamatic (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 1,810 kg (3,990 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 880 Selectamatic” | 1,960 kg (4,321 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 548” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 880 Selectamatic and the 548 (a). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 6 to 12Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 880 Selectamatic” | 16Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 548” | AheadThe Steyr 548 (a) has 33% more forward gears (4 gears) than the David Brown 880 Selectamatic (both forward gears, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 880 Selectamatic and the 548 (a). |
| Which is faster on the road? | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 880 Selectamatic” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 548” | AheadThe Steyr 548 (a) has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the David Brown 880 Selectamatic (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “David Brown 880 Selectamatic” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Steyr 548” | AheadThe Steyr 548 (a) offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the David Brown 880 Selectamatic does not (as stated by the sources). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | liveTraktorenlexikon, “Steyr 548” | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 880 Selectamatic. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “David Brown 880 Selectamatic” | 2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Steyr 548” | AheadThe Steyr 548 (a) is available with four-wheel drive; the David Brown 880 Selectamatic is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources). |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1965–1971 | 1977–1981 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Steyr 548 (a) is newer: production began 12 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Steyr 548 (a) has 41% more lift (535 kg / 1,179 lb) than the David Brown 880 Selectamatic (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The Steyr 548 (a) has 33% more forward gears (4 gears) than the David Brown 880 Selectamatic (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
- The Steyr 548 (a) has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the David Brown 880 Selectamatic (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- The Steyr 548 (a) offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the David Brown 880 Selectamatic does not (as stated by the sources).
- The Steyr 548 (a) is available with four-wheel drive; the David Brown 880 Selectamatic is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
- The Steyr 548 (a) is newer: production began 12 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 880 Selectamatic has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 548 (a) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources